Skip to content

ASC36

Ascletis Pharma's amylin receptor agonist peptide, developed in two formulations at once — a subcutaneous lipid depot aimed at monthly or quarterly dosing, and a once-weekly oral tablet. Both entered first-in-human trials in autumn 2026. Its most interesting engineering claim is that it does not fibrillate at neutral pH.

DPreliminaryLimited Data
Last updated 18 citations
TL;DR

ASC36 is an experimental weight-loss drug that copies amylin, a hormone your pancreas releases with insulin to tell your brain you are full. Ascletis is making two versions: an injection designed to last a month or more, and a weekly pill. Both started their first human trials in autumn 2026, so there are no results in people yet — everything published so far is animal data from the company.

What is ASC36?

ASC36 is an investigational amylin receptor agonist peptide for chronic weight management. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin after meals and signals satiety through the area postrema, slows gastric emptying and suppresses postprandial glucagon — a mechanism distinct from and complementary to GLP-1, which is why amylin analogues are the most watched class in obesity after the incretins. The page previously described ASC36 as a single weekly injection; that is wrong on both counts. Ascletis develops it as two products. ASC36i is a subcutaneous Self-Assembling Lipid Depot intended for once-monthly to once-quarterly dosing, and ASC36o is a once-weekly oral tablet built on a separate oral-peptide delivery technology. Both began phase 1 trials in autumn 2026 — the injectable on 28 September, the tablet on 13 October — and neither has reported any human data. The engineering claim worth attention is stability. Ascletis states that ASC36 shows no fibrillation at neutral pH, meaning it does not aggregate into the amyloid structures that human amylin notoriously forms. That is what allows co-formulation with the company's GLP-1/GIP dual agonist ASC35 in a single monthly injection, which is where the programme's commercial emphasis sits.

What ASC36 Is Investigated For

ASC36 has no human data. Both phase 1 studies are recruiting with 2027 completion dates, and no doses have been disclosed for any cohort. Everything known about the molecule is company-reported preclinical work, and there is no peer-reviewed literature mentioning it at all. The class it joins is, however, crowded and moving fast — faster than this page previously reflected. Cagrilintide combined with semaglutide produced 20.4% weight loss at 68 weeks in REDEFINE 1 and is under FDA review. Petrelintide reported 9.8% at 28 weeks in a phase 2 with gastrointestinal tolerability similar to placebo apart from mild nausea during escalation, and has moved into phase 3. Eloralintide, the most selective agent in the class, reported 20% weight loss at 48 weeks in a Lancet phase 2 and is in multiple phase 3 trials. A selective amylin agonist is no longer a novel proposition; what ASC36 proposes to add is dosing interval and route. Ascletis's preclinical claims are specific: a depot half-life of about 15 days in non-human primates, roughly three times petrelintide's; 10.01% versus 5.25% body-weight reduction against petrelintide in diet-induced obese rats at equimolar dosing; and for the oral tablet, 13.2% weight reduction in primates after seven days of once-daily dosing with oral bioavailability of 6 to 8%. These are sponsor-run comparisons against competitors' compounds, unpublished and unreplicated, and the company's own chief executive has described the animal models as highly predictive of human efficacy — a marketing claim rather than a finding.

Chronic weight management via amylin receptor agonism
Preliminary30%
Once-monthly to once-quarterly subcutaneous dosing
Preliminary30%
Once-weekly oral amylin dosing
Preliminary30%
Fixed-dose combination with a GLP-1/GIP dual agonist
Preliminary30%

History & Discovery

ASC36's public record begins on 30 October 2025, when Ascletis Pharma announced it had selected the compound as a development candidate, describing it as an amylin receptor peptide agonist discovered in-house through an AI-assisted structure-based drug discovery platform and formulated as a slow-release subcutaneous depot. Claims that development began in 2024 are not supported by any public source. The company had earlier been known for hepatitis C and B antivirals rather than metabolic disease. The announced preclinical package compared ASC36 directly against competitors: an observed depot half-life of about 15 days in non-human primates, three times petrelintide's, and 10.01% versus 5.25% body-weight reduction against petrelintide in diet-induced obese rats over seven days at equimolar dosing. A co-formulation with the GLP-1/GIP dual agonist ASC35 was announced for clinical development in November 2025. Investigational new drug applications for both the ASC36 injection and the ASC36_35 combination were submitted to the FDA in July 2026 and cleared the following month, announced on 10 August 2026. Dosing in the injectable phase 1 actually began on 28 September 2026, and the oral tablet study — announced on 8 September with primate data showing 13.2% weight reduction over seven days of once-daily dosing and oral bioavailability of 6 to 8% — began dosing on 13 October 2026. Both were first posted to ClinicalTrials.gov on 23 October 2026. The gap between announcement and actual trial start is worth noting whenever company dates and registry dates disagree: the registry records when participants were dosed. Like Ascletis's other metabolic assets, ASC36 is being developed United States-first, under US investigational new drug applications with US-only sites and no registered Chinese trial.

How It Works

Amylin is a hormone released from the pancreas alongside insulin after you eat. It tells the brain you have had enough, slows the stomach emptying and stops the liver releasing extra sugar. ASC36 is a synthetic, long-lasting version of that signal. One formulation is injected and designed to keep working for a month or more; the other is a tablet.

ASC36 activates amylin receptors, which are not standalone proteins but heterodimers of the calcitonin receptor with one of three receptor activity-modifying proteins, producing the AMY1R, AMY2R and AMY3R subtypes. The downstream pharmacology is canonical for the class: central anorectic signalling through the area postrema and connected brainstem and hypothalamic circuits, slowed gastric emptying, and suppression of postprandial glucagon. The pharmacologically consequential variable in this class is selectivity, and it is exactly what has not been disclosed for ASC36. Agents differ in how much they engage the calcitonin receptor relative to the amylin receptor subtypes, and that difference appears to determine tolerability rather than efficacy. Eloralintide preferentially activates human AMY1R — twelve-fold over the calcitonin receptor and eleven-fold over AMY3R — and induced significantly less conditioned taste avoidance in rats than the non-selective cagrilintide. The open question across the field is whether reduced food intake on these drugs reflects physiological satiation or aversive signalling, with receptor selectivity, exposure kinetics and downstream circuit recruitment all implicated. Ascletis describes ASC36 only as an amylin receptor agonist and has published no selectivity data, so it cannot be placed on that spectrum. The stability engineering is better documented. Native human amylin aggregates readily into amyloid fibrils; this is how islet amyloid polypeptide was discovered, and aggregated amylin is cytotoxic and implicated in beta-cell loss in type 2 diabetes. Every amylin analogue has to solve this — pramlintide's acidic formulation is a direct consequence, and petrelintide's development paper describes chemical-stability optimisation enabling formulation at about neutral pH as the central achievement. Ascletis reports that ASC36 shows no fibrillation around neutral pH and no aggregation or precipitation either alone or co-formulated, which is what makes a single-injection combination with the GLP-1/GIP dual agonist ASC35 feasible. Duration comes from formulation rather than from chemical modification of the peptide. The injectable uses a Self-Assembling Lipid Depot — a low-viscosity solution of lipids, solvents and drug that forms a gel-like depot in tissue after subcutaneous injection — with a reported observed half-life of about 15 days in non-human primates, which the company states is roughly three times petrelintide's and six times eloralintide's. The oral tablet uses a separate delivery technology, with reported primate absolute bioavailability of 8% at 10 mg and 6% at 25 mg and elimination half-lives of 116 and 167 hours respectively.

Evidence Snapshot

Overall Confidence28%

Human Clinical Evidence

None. Two phase 1 studies are recruiting: NCT07893093 for the subcutaneous formulations (about 144 participants, dosing from 28 September 2026, completion estimated June 2027) and NCT07893106 for the oral tablet (about 86 participants, dosing from 13 October 2026, completion estimated April 2027). Both are randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled with adverse events as the primary endpoint. No dose levels are disclosed and no results have been reported.

Animal / Preclinical

Company-reported only, unpublished and unreplicated. The claims are: a depot half-life of about 15 days in non-human primates, roughly three-fold petrelintide's and six-fold eloralintide's; 10.01% versus 5.25% body-weight reduction against petrelintide in diet-induced obese rats over seven days at equimolar dosing; approximately 91% and 32% greater relative weight reduction than petrelintide and eloralintide respectively; and for the oral tablet, up to 13.2% weight reduction in primates after seven days of once-daily dosing. Sponsor-run comparisons against competitors' drugs are the weakest form of comparative evidence.

Mechanistic Rationale

Strong for amylin receptor agonism, which cagrilintide, petrelintide and eloralintide have validated in humans, and strong for combining amylin with an incretin, which CagriSema has validated. Weaker for the specific propositions ASC36 rests on — that a lipid depot preserves efficacy across a monthly or quarterly interval, and that an orally delivered amylin peptide achieves useful exposure in humans at 6 to 8% bioavailability.

Research Gaps & Open Questions

What the current literature has not yet settled about ASC36:

  • 01ASC36's receptor selectivity across AMY1R, AMY2R, AMY3R and the calcitonin receptor. This is the single most informative missing number — it determines whether ASC36 resembles the selective eloralintide or the non-selective cagrilintide, and selectivity appears to drive tolerability rather than efficacy in this class.
  • 02All human pharmacokinetics, and specifically whether the 15-day primate depot half-life translates into a workable monthly or quarterly human interval.
  • 03Whether the oral formulation's 6 to 8% primate bioavailability produces useful human exposure, and at what dose.
  • 04The actual oral dosing interval, which the company's pipeline and its own filings describe inconsistently as once-weekly and once-daily.
  • 05Tolerability. Nausea is the limiting effect for this class and nothing is known about ASC36's profile.
  • 06Whether the sponsor's preclinical superiority claims over petrelintide and eloralintide are real. They are unpublished, unreplicated, sponsor-run comparisons against competitors' compounds, and rodent weight-loss magnitude has a poor record of predicting human results.
  • 07Immunogenicity of a depot-resident peptide, which the injectable trial measures and nothing public addresses.
  • 08The co-formulation's status. ASC36_35FDC was announced as having entered phase 1 in August 2026 but has no ClinicalTrials.gov registration, so it cannot be independently verified.
  • 09Body composition. No lean-mass data exists, and it is a standard question for the class — amylin agonists are of interest partly because of a hypothesis that they preserve lean mass better than incretins, which has not been established.

Forms & Administration

Two formulations in parallel first-in-human development. ASC36i is a subcutaneous Self-Assembling Lipid Depot intended for once-monthly to once-quarterly dosing; its phase 1 tests two distinct depot formulations, designated A and B, across single- and multiple-ascending-dose cohorts. ASC36o is an oral tablet, described by the company as designed for once-weekly administration, whose phase 1 includes a food-effect assessment. Neither is commercially available and no dose levels have been disclosed for either. A fixed-dose co-formulation with the GLP-1/GIP dual agonist ASC35, given as a single monthly injection, was announced as having entered phase 1 in August 2026 but has no trial registration on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Dosing & Protocols

The ranges below reflect protocols commonly discussed in the literature and by clinicians — not a prescription. Actual dosing for any individual should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider who knows the patient.

Typical Range

Not disclosed. Both phase 1 trials label their cohorts only as ascending dose levels.

Frequency

The injectable is designed for once-monthly to once-quarterly subcutaneous administration. The oral tablet is described by the company as designed for once-weekly dosing.

Timing Considerations

Time of day

Not established for either formulation

Relative to meals

The oral phase 1 includes a food-effect assessment, results not reported. Amylin is physiologically a postprandial signal, but no dosing relationship to meals has been established for ASC36

Relative to exercise

Not tied to exercise timing.

For a monthly or quarterly depot, timing within a day is irrelevant; what matters is whether exposure at the end of the interval remains therapeutic, which the multiple-ascending-dose cohorts are designed to characterise.

Cycle Length

Chronic and indefinite would be anticipated for weight management, but nothing has been established.

Protocol Notes

No human dosing information exists for either formulation, and the trial registrations disclose no dose levels. One inconsistency in the public record is worth flagging rather than smoothing over. Ascletis's pipeline describes ASC36o as designed for once-weekly oral administration, but its own regulatory filing reports that all the supporting primate work used once-daily dosing and states that the 116 to 167 hour elimination half-life supports once-daily and less frequent oral dosing. The phase 1 tests single and multiple ascending doses without specifying an interval. The honest reading is that once-weekly is the stated design intent and the actual interval is still being characterised. For the injectable, the central uncertainty is whether a monthly-to-quarterly interval survives translation. The reported 15-day primate half-life is the basis for the claim, and depot pharmacokinetics are strongly species-dependent. The phase 1's structure — single-ascending-dose cohorts with long follow-up before multiple-ascending-dose cohorts, across two separate depot formulations — is designed around exactly that question, and the inclusion of anti-drug antibody measurement acknowledges a second one: what the immune system makes of a peptide resident in tissue for weeks.

ASC36 is an investigational drug in first-in-human phase 1 trials in both its formulations. It is not approved anywhere, no dose has been established, and it is not available outside those trials.

Timeline of Effects

Onset

Not characterised in humans. Amylin analogues as a class reduce food intake from the first doses, with effects on satiety apparent early, but a depot formulation releases gradually by design and onset would be expected to be correspondingly slower.

Peak Effect

Not characterised in humans. In non-human primates the depot half-life was reported at about 15 days and the oral elimination half-life at 116 to 167 hours. For the class generally, weight loss continues accruing for many months — petrelintide was still separating from placebo at 28 weeks and eloralintide at 48 — so any phase 1 timepoint will understate the eventual effect.

After Discontinuation

Prolonged for the injectable, and this is the trade-off the formulation makes. A depot engineered to release over a month or a quarter cannot be removed once injected, so exposure persists for months after a final dose. For chronic weight management that may be an advantage; where rapid withdrawal is needed — pregnancy, surgery, an adverse reaction — it is a real constraint. The oral tablet has no such issue. As with all weight-management pharmacotherapy, weight regain after genuine discontinuation should be expected.

Common Questions

How is ASC36 different from cagrilintide?

Same receptor family, different molecule, and a different delivery ambition. Cagrilintide is a once-weekly subcutaneous amylin analogue, used most prominently as the amylin half of CagriSema alongside semaglutide. ASC36's injectable formulation is designed for once-monthly to once-quarterly dosing using a lipid depot rather than weekly injection, and there is also an oral tablet version intended for weekly dosing — no approved or late-stage amylin analogue is oral. One further distinction has not been established and matters: cagrilintide is a non-selective agonist that also engages the calcitonin receptor, while eloralintide is selective for amylin receptors, and that difference appears to drive tolerability. Ascletis has never published ASC36's selectivity across AMY1R, AMY2R, AMY3R and the calcitonin receptor, so which kind of agonist it is remains unknown.

Why does it matter that ASC36 does not fibrillate?

Because human amylin's defining chemical problem is that it aggregates. Islet amyloid polypeptide — amylin's other name — was discovered through its tendency to form amyloid deposits in pancreatic islets, and aggregated amylin is cytotoxic and implicated in beta-cell loss in type 2 diabetes. Any amylin analogue therefore has to be engineered against that tendency, which is why pramlintide requires an acidic formulation and cannot be mixed with insulin. Ascletis states ASC36 shows no fibrillation around neutral pH and no aggregation or precipitation in either its own formulation or its co-formulation. The practical payoff is combination: a peptide stable at neutral pH can share a syringe with another peptide, which is what makes a single monthly injection of amylin plus incretin possible.

What stage is ASC36 at?

Two phase 1 trials, both recruiting, neither reporting. The injectable study (NCT07893093) began dosing on 28 September 2026, enrols about 144 participants across two formulations at sites in San Antonio and Salt Lake City, and is estimated to complete in June 2027. The oral study (NCT07893106) began on 13 October 2026, enrols about 86 participants in South Miami, includes a food-effect assessment, and completes around April 2027. Both are randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled single- and multiple-ascending-dose designs with adverse events as the primary endpoint and body weight among the secondary measures. The injectable study also measures treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies, which is appropriate for a peptide held in tissue for weeks. No dose levels are disclosed in either.

How does amylin differ from GLP-1, and why combine them?

They reduce food intake through different circuits, which is the basis for combining them. GLP-1 receptor agonists act substantially through hypothalamic and brainstem pathways and slow gastric emptying, with nausea as the dose-limiting effect. Amylin signals primarily through the area postrema to produce satiation, and in its more selective forms appears to do so with less aversive signalling — eloralintide induced significantly less conditioned taste avoidance in rats than the non-selective cagrilintide. Clinically the combination has been validated: cagrilintide with semaglutide reached 20.4% weight loss at 68 weeks against 3.0% for placebo. Whether reduced food intake reflects genuine satiation or an aversive signal is an active question in this field, and receptor selectivity and exposure kinetics are thought to determine which.

Can I get ASC36?

No. Both formulations are in first-in-human phase 1 trials at a handful of US sites and are not available any other way. There is no published sequence, no peer-reviewed paper of any kind, and the compound has never existed outside a clinical supply chain. Anything offered for sale as ASC36 is not ASC36.

Who ASC36 Is NOT For

Contraindications
  • •All use outside the clinical trials. ASC36 has no established dose, no human safety data and no legitimate supply route.
  • •Pregnancy and breastfeeding — excluded from both trials, and particularly consequential for a depot that cannot be withdrawn.
  • •Children and adolescents — both trials enrol adults aged 18 to 65.
  • •Diabetes of any type, which is an exclusion criterion in the injectable trial rather than a safety finding, but means no data will exist in that population from this programme.
  • •Clinically significant gastroparesis or gastric-emptying abnormality, since amylin agonism slows gastric emptying.
  • •Known hypersensitivity or intolerance to amylin receptor agonists or related compounds — an explicit exclusion in the trial protocol.
  • •History of cardiovascular disease and clinically significant ECG abnormalities, both trial exclusions at this stage of development.
  • •Concurrent insulin therapy would require careful attention, since amylin analogues reduce postprandial glucose and pramlintide carries a severe hypoglycaemia warning when combined with insulin.

Drug & Supplement Interactions

No interaction data exists for ASC36 and none can at this stage. The considerations below are class-level. The interaction that matters most for amylin analogues is with insulin. Pramlintide, the only approved amylin analogue, carries a boxed warning for severe hypoglycaemia when used with insulin, and its label requires insulin dose reduction at initiation. ASC36's trials exclude people with diabetes, so the scenario does not arise in the current programme, but it would become central if the compound were ever developed in that population. Slowed gastric emptying is the second consideration, shared with the incretins: it can delay or reduce absorption of co-administered oral drugs, which matters most for narrow-therapeutic-index medicines and oral contraceptives. Pramlintide's label advises separating oral medications where rapid absorption matters. How a monthly depot with gradual release behaves in this respect, as opposed to a weekly injection with distinct peaks, is unknown and is one of the more interesting unanswered questions about the formulation. As a peptide, ASC36 would be expected to be cleared by peptidase degradation rather than cytochrome P450 metabolism, making classical pharmacokinetic interactions unlikely. The lipid and organic-solvent excipients of the depot are a less familiar exposure, and nothing has been published about them.

Safety Profile

Safety Information

Common Side Effects

Unknown. No human safety data exists — both phase 1 studies are ongoing with 2027 completion datesClass expectation only: nausea is the characteristic dose-limiting effect of amylin analogues, typically during dose escalation, with vomiting less prominent than for GLP-1 agonistsInjection-site reactions would be anticipated for a depot formulation, though none have been reported

Cautions

  • • Investigational and at the earliest clinical stage, with no efficacy or safety result in humans for either formulation.
  • • All preclinical figures are company-reported, unpublished and unreplicated, and include head-to-head comparisons against competitors' compounds run by the sponsor.
  • • ASC36's receptor selectivity has never been disclosed. Whether it behaves like a selective amylin receptor agonist or a non-selective dual amylin/calcitonin receptor agonist is unknown, and that distinction is thought to be the main driver of tolerability within this class.
  • • The depot formulation is designed to release over a month or longer and cannot be withdrawn once injected — a meaningful constraint in a first-in-human setting and if pregnancy, surgery or an adverse event intervenes.
  • • Amylin analogues slow gastric emptying, so the class carries the same caution around gastroparesis and around the absorption of co-administered oral drugs as the incretins.
  • • Immunogenicity is a live question for any peptide resident in tissue for weeks; the injectable trial measures anti-drug antibodies, and no results exist.

What We Don't Know

Everything clinical, including dose range, tolerability, and whether the projected monthly-to-quarterly interval survives contact with human pharmacokinetics. Beyond that: ASC36's receptor selectivity profile, which determines where it sits relative to cagrilintide and eloralintide on the tolerability spectrum; whether the oral tablet's 6 to 8% primate bioavailability translates; and whether ASC36o is dosed weekly or daily, since the company's pipeline describes it as once-weekly while its own filings report once-daily primate dosing and a half-life it says supports once-daily and less frequent administration.

Myths & Misconceptions

Myth

ASC36 is a weekly injection.

Reality

The injectable is designed for once-monthly to once-quarterly dosing, which is the programme's entire differentiation in a class where cagrilintide, petrelintide and eloralintide are all weekly. Separately, there is an oral tablet version, which the page previously did not mention at all. Describing ASC36 as a weekly injection gets both the interval and the number of products wrong.

Myth

ASC36 is a GLP-1 agonist.

Reality

It is an amylin receptor agonist. The mechanisms are complementary rather than overlapping — amylin signals satiation largely through the area postrema while GLP-1 acts through hypothalamic and brainstem circuits and more strongly on gastric emptying — which is precisely why they are combined, as in CagriSema and in Ascletis's own ASC36_35 co-formulation. They are distinct pharmacologies that happen to point at the same outcome.

Myth

ASC36 is the first amylin analogue that can be dosed less often than weekly, so it is ahead of the field.

Reality

It is behind the field on evidence and ahead only on an untested formulation claim. Cagrilintide-semaglutide reported 20.4% weight loss at 68 weeks and is under FDA review; petrelintide and eloralintide are both in phase 3, with eloralintide reporting 20% weight loss at 48 weeks in a Lancet phase 2. ASC36 has no human data at all. A longer dosing interval is a real potential advantage, but it is a hypothesis entering phase 1, not a demonstrated one.

Myth

The animal results predict what ASC36 will do in people.

Reality

That claim has been made explicitly by the company's chief executive, who described the models as highly predictive of human efficacy, and it should be treated as marketing rather than evidence. The figures — 10.01% versus 5.25% against petrelintide in diet-induced obese rats, roughly 91% and 32% greater relative reduction than petrelintide and eloralintide — are unpublished, unreplicated, sponsor-run comparisons against competitors' drugs. Rodent weight-loss magnitude has repeatedly failed to predict human results in obesity pharmacology.

Myth

Amylin analogues are gentler than GLP-1 drugs, so ASC36 will be well tolerated.

Reality

The class does look better on tolerability in places — petrelintide's phase 2 reported gastrointestinal tolerability similar to placebo apart from mild nausea during escalation — but that is not a property of being an amylin analogue. It tracks receptor selectivity: the selective eloralintide caused significantly less conditioned taste avoidance in rats than the non-selective cagrilintide, and cagrilintide's own phase 2 reported nausea in 20 to 47% of participants against 18% on placebo. Since ASC36's selectivity has never been published, there is no basis for predicting which end of that range it will land on.

Published Research

18 studies

Petrelintide, a human amylin analogue for the treatment of obesity (ZUPREME 1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Garvey WT et al., Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2026. The peer-reviewed phase 2 for the competitor Ascletis benchmarks ASC36 against in rats: 9.8% weight reduction at 28 weeks against 1.7% for placebo, with gastrointestinal tolerability similar to placebo apart from predominantly mild nausea during escalation. The tolerability finding is the more important half — it is the standard a new amylin analogue has to meet.

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 42810355

Beyond GLP-1: Amylin-based pharmacotherapy and the search for better-tolerated weight-loss drugs

ReviewPMID: 42586227

Amylin Analogs: The Next Major Class of Weight Loss Therapy: A Review of Experimental Data and Early-Phase Clinical Trials

ReviewPMID: 42452898

Novel Amylin-Based Therapies for Weight Management in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis

Network Meta-AnalysisPMID: 42175595

Amylin analogues as a novel perspective in anti-obesity therapy

ReviewPMID: 42068083

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Petrelintide for Weight Management: Two Randomized, Controlled Phase 1 Trials

Clinical TrialPMID: 42017294

Long-acting amylin-related peptides as therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes

ReviewPMID: 41747885

Development of Petrelintide: a Potent, Stable, Long-Acting Human Amylin Analogue

Mechanistic StudyPMID: 41217931

Eloralintide, a selective amylin receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity: a 48-week phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 41207310

Eloralintide (LY3841136), a novel amylin receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity: From discovery to clinical proof of concept

Briere DA et al., Molecular Metabolism 2025. The clearest demonstration that receptor selectivity drives tolerability in this class: eloralintide preferentially activates human AMY1R — twelve-fold over the calcitonin receptor and eleven-fold over AMY3R — and induced significantly less conditioned taste avoidance in rats than the non-selective cagrilintide. ASC36 has never published comparable data, so where it sits on this axis is unknown.

Clinical TrialPMID: 41109426

Coadministered Cagrilintide and Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity

Garvey WT et al., NEJM 2025 (REDEFINE 1). The validation of combining an amylin analogue with an incretin, and the benchmark any amylin combination is now measured against: 20.4% mean weight reduction at week 68 against 3.0% on placebo in 3,417 participants. This is the result ASC36's co-formulation strategy is aimed at matching in a monthly injection.

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 40544433

Cagrilintide-Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 40544432

A structural basis for amylin receptor phenotype

Mechanistic StudyPMID: 35324283

Once-weekly cagrilintide for weight management in people with overweight and obesity: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 34798060

Amylin: Pharmacology, Physiology, and Clinical Potential

Hay DL et al., Pharmacological Reviews 2015. The standard reference on amylin biology, and the source of the detail that matters most for interpreting any agent in this class: amylin receptors are not single proteins but heterodimers of the calcitonin receptor with receptor activity-modifying proteins, producing multiple subtypes that different analogues engage to different degrees.

ReviewPMID: 26071095

Islet amyloid polypeptide, islet amyloid, and diabetes mellitus

Westermark P et al., Physiological Reviews 2011. Explains why ASC36's non-fibrillation claim is a design achievement rather than a footnote: amylin was discovered through its ability to aggregate into pancreatic islet amyloid, and aggregated amylin is cytotoxic and implicated in beta-cell loss in type 2 diabetes. Every analogue in this class is engineered against that tendency.

ReviewPMID: 21742788

Phase I study of two formulations of ASC36 injection for subcutaneous use in adults with obesity or overweight (NCT07893093)

The primary record for ASC36's injectable programme: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16 cohorts across two depot formulations, about 144 participants, dosing from 28 September 2026 at sites in San Antonio and Salt Lake City, completion estimated June 2027. Notable for measuring treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies among its secondary endpoints — appropriate for a peptide held in tissue for weeks, and a question no public material otherwise addresses.

Clinical Trial Registry

Phase I study of ASC36 tablets for oral use in adults with obesity or overweight (NCT07893106)

Clinical Trial Registry

Quick Facts

Class
Amylin Analog
Tier
D
Evidence
Preliminary
Safety
Limited Data
Updated
Oct 2026
Citations
18PubMed

Also known as

ASC36iASC36oAscletis amylin receptor agonist

Tags

InvestigationalAmylinObesityPhase 1

Evidence Score

Overall Confidence28%

Clinical Trials

View Clinical Trials

Links to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.