Certepetide
A 9-amino-acid cyclic tumor-homing peptide (Lisata Therapeutics) derived from Erkki Ruoslahti's iRGD platform that activates the CendR (C-end Rule) tumor-penetration pathway — binding αv-integrins on tumor vasculature, undergoing neuropilin-1-mediated cleavage, and enabling enhanced delivery of co-administered chemotherapy into otherwise-impermeable tumor tissue. Active Phase 2/3 development in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel) and Phase 2a in glioblastoma.
What is Certepetide?
Certepetide (development codes CEND-1 and LSTA1) is a 9-amino-acid cyclic tumor-homing peptide developed by Lisata Therapeutics (formerly Caladrium Biosciences) and licensed from Erkki Ruoslahti's group at the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute. The peptide is a chemically optimized member of the iRGD (internalizing RGD) family — synthetic peptides Ruoslahti's group developed to exploit a tumor-penetration pathway distinct from classical receptor-mediated drug delivery. Certepetide's mechanism involves a two-step receptor engagement: it first binds αv-integrins (specifically αvβ3 and αvβ5) on tumor vasculature, where proteolytic cleavage by tumor-associated proteases releases a fragment with an exposed C-terminal RXXR/K motif that engages neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) on the same vascular endothelium and adjacent tumor stroma. The NRP-1 engagement activates the CendR (C-end Rule) tissue-penetration pathway — a transient and tumor-selective increase in vascular and stromal permeability that enables enhanced delivery of co-administered chemotherapy, antibodies, nanoparticles, or other therapeutics into tumor tissue that would otherwise be poorly accessible. The mechanism distinguishes certepetide from antibody-drug conjugates and other receptor-targeted delivery approaches because the tumor-penetration effect operates on bystander co-administered drugs without requiring direct conjugation. The foundational work establishing the iRGD/CendR mechanism includes Sugahara's 2009 Cancer Cell paper on tissue-penetrating delivery (PMID 19962669) and the 2010 Science paper showing that co-administration of iRGD enhances cancer drug efficacy in animal models (PMID 20378772). Lisata Therapeutics has advanced certepetide through clinical development since the late 2010s, with the first-in-human Phase 1b trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reported by Dean and colleagues in Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2022 (PMID 35803294) — the trial combined certepetide with the standard PDAC chemotherapy backbone of gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel and reported acceptable safety with encouraging efficacy signals in a difficult-to-treat malignancy. Subsequent population pharmacokinetic work (Winning 2025 Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, PMID 39789733) and pharmacokinetic characterization (Järveläinen 2023 International Journal of Molecular Sciences, PMID 36982773) have refined the dosing and exposure framework. The current development pipeline includes the BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC trial (combination with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel as first-line metastatic PDAC therapy), the LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a glioblastoma trial (combination with temozolomide; protocol published by Truusalu 2025 in BMJ Open, PMID 41248393), and additional combinations across solid tumor indications. Certepetide is investigational and not FDA-approved. The peptide represents a distinctive approach within oncology drug development — a non-cytotoxic delivery enhancer rather than a tumor-killing agent itself — and the clinical hypothesis is that it makes existing chemotherapy more effective in tumors that have been historically resistant to drug penetration (PDAC, glioblastoma, peritoneal carcinomatosis). Whether the BOLSTER Phase 3 trial and other late-stage programs will translate the encouraging Phase 1b/2 signals into FDA-approval-grade efficacy is the principal open question.
What Certepetide Is Investigated For
Certepetide is a clinical-trial-stage oncology investigational drug, not a consumer-research-channel peptide. The molecule is being developed by Lisata Therapeutics for combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (the BOLSTER Phase 3 trial in metastatic first-line PDAC, combined with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel) and in glioblastoma multiforme (the LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a trial, combined with temozolomide). The clinical hypothesis is that certepetide's tumor-penetrating mechanism — αv-integrin binding plus neuropilin-1-mediated CendR pathway activation — enables enhanced chemotherapy delivery into tumor tissue that has been historically poorly accessible to systemic drug therapy. The foundational work from Erkki Ruoslahti's group at Sanford Burnham (Sugahara 2009 Cancer Cell, 2010 Science) established the iRGD/CendR mechanism in animal models, and the first-in-human Phase 1b PDAC trial (Dean 2022 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol) demonstrated translation feasibility in patients. The Phase 3 BOLSTER readout will determine whether certepetide reaches FDA approval. This is investigational oncology, not a peptide consumers self-administer. There is no clinical use outside Lisata-sponsored trials, no FDA approval, no validated dosing protocol for off-label use, and no consumer-research-channel positioning that makes practical sense. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer or glioblastoma should consult their oncology team about clinical-trial enrollment. The peptide is included in this directory because it represents a substantive advanced-stage oncology peptide drug development program with peer-reviewed translational data — distinct from research-channel peptide marketing and worth tracking as the Phase 3 readout approaches.
History & Discovery
The certepetide story begins with Erkki Ruoslahti's group at the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (formerly the Burnham Institute) in La Jolla, California. Ruoslahti is a foundational figure in integrin biology — his 1980s work characterizing the RGD motif as the cell-attachment recognition sequence in fibronectin established a substantial portion of modern integrin pharmacology. In the late 2000s, Ruoslahti's lab applied phage-display screening of tumor-vasculature binding peptides to identify iRGD (internalizing RGD), a cyclic peptide that not only bound αv-integrins on tumor vasculature but also engaged neuropilin-1 after proteolytic cleavage — activating a tissue-penetration pathway that the group named the C-end Rule (CendR). The foundational publications came in rapid succession. The Sugahara 2009 Cancer Cell paper (PMID 19962669) introduced the iRGD/CendR mechanism with proof-of-concept tissue-penetration data. The Sugahara 2010 Science paper (PMID 20378772) extended the work to demonstrate that simple co-administration of iRGD with cancer drugs (without direct conjugation) enhances drug efficacy in animal tumor models — the translational concept that would eventually drive certepetide's clinical positioning as a delivery enhancer rather than a conjugated drug-targeting agent. The Alberici 2013 Cancer Research paper (PMID 23151901) on de novo design of tumor-penetrating peptides extended the mechanistic understanding. Lisata Therapeutics (formerly Caladrium Biosciences) licensed the certepetide development rights from Sanford Burnham and advanced the molecule through clinical development. The first-in-human Phase 1b trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was reported by Dean and colleagues in Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2022 (PMID 35803294), combining certepetide (then called CEND-1) with the standard PDAC chemotherapy backbone of gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. The trial demonstrated translation feasibility with acceptable safety and encouraging efficacy signals, supporting advancement to the Phase 3 BOLSTER trial in metastatic first-line PDAC. The 2021 Hurtado de Mendoza Nature Communications paper (PMID 33750829) established β5 integrin upregulation in PDAC vasculature as a mechanistic rationale for PDAC as a particularly suitable indication. The 2023 Järveläinen IJMS paper (PMID 36982773) characterized the pharmacokinetics, disposition, and duration of CendR pathway activation. The 2025 Winning Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev paper (PMID 39789733) refined population pharmacokinetic modeling in metastatic PDAC patients. The LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a glioblastoma protocol (Truusalu 2025 BMJ Open, PMID 41248393) extended the development program to a second high-unmet-need indication. The peptide received the International Nonproprietary Name 'certepetide' as part of the regulatory development process, alongside the development codes CEND-1 and LSTA1. The INN assignment reflects the advanced regulatory and clinical-trial infrastructure of the program. As of 2026, certepetide sits in Phase 3 PDAC development and Phase 2a glioblastoma development, with the BOLSTER Phase 3 readout as the principal regulatory inflection point. Whether certepetide reaches FDA approval will depend on whether the encouraging Phase 1b/2 signals translate to clinically meaningful overall-survival benefit in the Phase 3 trial.
How It Works
Certepetide is a tiny 9-amino-acid peptide developed by Lisata Therapeutics that acts like a key for tumors. When you give it alongside chemotherapy, it binds to the blood vessels feeding tumors, gets cut by tumor-associated enzymes, and then briefly opens up the tumor's normally-tight defenses so the chemotherapy drugs can actually reach the cancer cells. It doesn't kill cancer itself — it just makes the chemo drugs you're already getting much more effective. The lead use is for pancreatic cancer (which is famously hard to treat partly because chemo can't reach the tumor), where it's currently in Phase 3 trials combined with the standard chemotherapy regimen. There's also a Phase 2 trial in glioblastoma. It's not FDA-approved yet — the Phase 3 readout will determine whether it gets approved.
Certepetide is a 9-amino-acid cyclic peptide (sequence cyclic-CRGDKGPDC, derived from the original iRGD scaffold) developed through chemical optimization of Erkki Ruoslahti's iRGD (internalizing RGD) platform at the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute. The mechanism involves a two-step receptor engagement that activates the C-end Rule (CendR) tissue-penetration pathway — a tumor-selective transient permeability increase that enables enhanced co-administered drug delivery. Step 1 — αv-integrin binding: Certepetide's RGD motif binds αv-integrins (specifically αvβ3 and αvβ5) on tumor vasculature endothelium. αv-integrins are upregulated on tumor blood vessels relative to normal vasculature, providing initial tumor-selective targeting. The integrin binding alone does not produce the tumor-penetration effect — it positions the peptide for the second step. Step 2 — Proteolytic cleavage and neuropilin-1 engagement: Tumor-associated proteases (predominantly furin-family proteases at the tumor vasculature) cleave certepetide between specific residues to expose a C-terminal RXXR/K motif. This exposed C-terminal motif then engages neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) on the same tumor vascular endothelium and adjacent tumor stroma. The NRP-1 engagement activates the CendR pathway — a vesicular transcytosis mechanism that produces transient and tumor-selective increases in vascular and stromal permeability. The CendR effect is paracrine in nature: once activated, it enhances penetration of bystander molecules (small-molecule chemotherapy drugs, antibodies, nanoparticles, oligonucleotides) into the tumor tissue without requiring direct conjugation. The Sugahara 2009 Cancer Cell paper (PMID 19962669) demonstrated the principle of tissue-penetrating delivery via iRGD-class peptides, and the 2010 Science paper (PMID 20378772) extended the work to show that simple co-administration of iRGD with cancer drugs (without conjugation) enhances drug efficacy in animal tumor models. The mechanism distinguishes certepetide from antibody-drug conjugates (which deliver payloads via direct conjugation to tumor-cell-targeting antibodies) and from receptor-targeted delivery approaches (which require conjugation of the targeting moiety to the therapeutic). Clinical pharmacokinetic characterization includes the Järveläinen 2023 IJMS paper (PMID 36982773) on PK, disposition, and duration of action, and the Winning 2025 Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development paper (PMID 39789733) on population PK in metastatic PDAC patients. Certepetide is administered intravenously as a short infusion shortly before each chemotherapy dose, allowing the CendR pathway activation to coincide with peak chemotherapy plasma concentrations. The transient nature of the permeability increase is part of the safety profile — chronic permeability increase would have implications for off-target tissue exposure that are mitigated by the brief duration of the CendR effect. The Hurtado de Mendoza 2021 Nature Communications paper (PMID 33750829) extended the mechanism to β5-integrin-rich pancreas cancer and established the mechanistic case for PDAC as a particularly suitable indication. The β5 integrin upregulation in PDAC vasculature, combined with the dense desmoplastic stroma that has historically limited PDAC chemotherapy efficacy, makes the tumor-penetration mechanism a well-matched therapeutic strategy.
Evidence Snapshot
Human Clinical Evidence
Moderate and rapidly expanding. Phase 1b first-in-human PDAC trial (Dean 2022 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, PMID 35803294) demonstrated translation feasibility with acceptable safety and encouraging efficacy signals. Population pharmacokinetic work in metastatic PDAC patients (Winning 2025 Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, PMID 39789733) refined the exposure-dose framework. BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC trial in active enrollment; LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a glioblastoma trial protocol published 2025 (Truusalu, BMJ Open, PMID 41248393). FDA approval pending Phase 3 readout.
Animal / Preclinical
Substantial. Foundational iRGD/CendR mechanism work from Ruoslahti's group at Sanford Burnham, including Sugahara 2009 Cancer Cell (PMID 19962669) on tissue-penetrating delivery and Sugahara 2010 Science (PMID 20378772) on coadministration enhancement. Mechanism extension to PDAC via Hurtado de Mendoza 2021 Nature Communications (PMID 33750829). Multiple animal studies across tumor models demonstrate enhanced co-administered drug delivery and improved tumor response.
Mechanistic Rationale
Strong. Two-step αv-integrin binding plus neuropilin-1-mediated CendR pathway activation is well-characterized at the receptor and cell-biology level. The mechanism is mechanistically distinct from antibody-drug conjugates and receptor-targeted delivery, providing a credible rationale for why certepetide might enhance chemotherapy efficacy in tumors with poor drug penetration.
Research Gaps & Open Questions
What the current literature has not yet settled about Certepetide:
- 01Whether the BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC trial will demonstrate clinically meaningful overall-survival benefit with certepetide + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone — the principal regulatory inflection point.
- 02Whether the tumor-penetration mechanism translates from PDAC to glioblastoma (LSTA1-GBM-2A) and to other solid tumors with similar drug-penetration barriers.
- 03Whether certepetide can be combined with ADCs, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, or other novel oncology drug classes to produce additive tumor-penetration benefit.
- 04The optimal dosing schedule relative to chemotherapy administration — whether the brief CendR activation window can be optimized for different chemotherapy backbone pharmacokinetics.
- 05The mechanism's tumor-selectivity in advanced metastatic disease — whether the αv-integrin and neuropilin-1 expression profiles that drive PDAC tumor selectivity hold up across different tumor histologies.
- 06Long-term safety of repeated certepetide administration over multiple chemotherapy cycles, beyond the durations characterized in the Phase 1b and Phase 2 trials.
Forms & Administration
Certepetide is administered as a short intravenous infusion shortly before each chemotherapy dose, allowing the transient tumor-penetration enhancement to coincide with peak chemotherapy plasma concentrations. In the BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC trial, certepetide is co-administered with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel on the standard PDAC chemotherapy schedule. In the LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a glioblastoma trial, certepetide is combined with temozolomide. The peptide is supplied as a sterile infusion preparation through Lisata Therapeutics for trial use only. There is no FDA-approved formulation, no compounding-pharmacy or telehealth availability, and no validated off-trial dosing.
Common Questions
Who Certepetide Is NOT For
- •Patients not enrolled in a Lisata-sponsored clinical trial — certepetide is investigational and not appropriate for off-trial use
- •Pregnancy — investigational chemotherapy combination not appropriate during pregnancy
- •Patients with severe hypersensitivity to certepetide or to any of the chemotherapy backbone components in the relevant trial
- •Patients whose oncology team determines they are not eligible for the relevant clinical trial based on disease stage, performance status, or other inclusion/exclusion criteria
- •Pediatric populations — current development is in adult metastatic PDAC and adult glioblastoma; pediatric oncology applications are not in current clinical development
Drug & Supplement Interactions
Documented drug-interaction data for certepetide come from the trial-stage development context. The intended interaction is with co-administered chemotherapy — certepetide is designed to enhance the tumor delivery of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, temozolomide, and other chemotherapy backbone agents. The combination toxicity profile reflects the underlying chemotherapy plus minor additive contributions from the peptide, with the dominant adverse events attributable to the chemotherapy rather than the peptide. Interaction with concurrent supportive-care medications (anti-emetics, growth-factor support, transfusion support, etc.) follows the standard chemotherapy combination management. Patients enrolling in certepetide trials should disclose all concurrent medications to the trial team.
Safety Profile
Common Side Effects
Cautions
- • Investigational drug — only administered in Lisata-sponsored clinical trials, not available off-trial
- • Combination with chemotherapy carries the standard chemotherapy safety considerations (myelosuppression, neuropathy, gastrointestinal toxicity, etc.)
- • Patients should be evaluated by oncology team for trial eligibility — certepetide is not appropriate for off-protocol use
- • Compounded or research-chemical 'certepetide' from non-Lisata sources is not the clinical-grade molecule and should not be used
What We Don't Know
The principal unknown is whether the BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC trial will demonstrate clinically meaningful overall-survival benefit with certepetide + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone — the readout is the critical determinant of FDA approval. The long-term safety profile of certepetide in chronic-administration scenarios is being characterized through ongoing trials. The translation from PDAC to glioblastoma, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and other solid tumors is at earlier development stages. Whether the tumor-penetration mechanism produces durable clinical benefit across multiple chemotherapy combinations and tumor types, or whether certepetide's role will be more narrow, will be answered by the broader development program over the next several years.
Legal Status
United States
Certepetide is investigational and not FDA-approved. It is administered only to participants enrolled in Lisata-sponsored clinical trials (BOLSTER Phase 3 PDAC, LSTA1-GBM-2A Phase 2a glioblastoma, and earlier-stage combination programs). It is not legally available through compounding pharmacies, telehealth platforms, or retail prescribers. Material sold under the certepetide, CEND-1, or LSTA1 names on research-chemical sites is not authorized for human use.
International
No regulatory authority has approved certepetide in any jurisdiction. Trial sites span North America, Europe, Australia, and other regions under the relevant regulatory frameworks. Commercial availability does not exist anywhere as of mid-2026.
Sports & Competition
Certepetide is not specifically named on the WADA Prohibited List. As an investigational oncology drug delivered as a chemotherapy adjunct rather than a performance-enhancing agent, it does not have an obvious doping context. The S0 category (substances not approved by any government regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use) covers it, and athletes subject to WADA codes should treat investigational oncology drugs as prohibited unless under approved Therapeutic Use Exemption.
Regulatory status changes over time. Verify current local rules with a qualified professional.
Myths & Misconceptions
Myth
Certepetide is a cancer treatment that kills cancer cells.
Reality
It is not. Certepetide is a tumor-penetrating peptide that does not have direct cytotoxic activity on cancer cells. Its mechanism is to enhance the tumor-tissue delivery of co-administered chemotherapy — gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel for PDAC, temozolomide for glioblastoma. The cancer killing is done by the chemotherapy backbone; certepetide makes the chemotherapy more effective by enabling better tumor penetration. This is mechanistically distinct from antibody-drug conjugates (which deliver cytotoxic payloads directly to tumor cells) and from chemotherapy itself.
Myth
Certepetide is FDA-approved.
Reality
It is not. Certepetide is investigational and only administered in Lisata-sponsored clinical trials. The principal regulatory inflection point is the BOLSTER Phase 3 trial in metastatic PDAC, with readout pending. The INN assignment (certepetide as the international nonproprietary name, replacing the development codes CEND-1 and LSTA1) reflects advanced regulatory infrastructure but does not equal approval — INN assignment occurs during clinical development, before approval. Whether certepetide reaches FDA approval depends on the Phase 3 readout and subsequent regulatory review.
Myth
Buying certepetide from research-channel vendors gives you the Lisata clinical product.
Reality
It does not. Certepetide is an investigational oncology drug supplied only by Lisata Therapeutics for clinical-trial use. Material sold under the certepetide, CEND-1, or LSTA1 names through research-chemical or grey-market sources is not the clinical-grade Lisata product, has no validated chemistry or quality control, and should not be used. Patients with metastatic PDAC or glioblastoma interested in certepetide should consult their oncology team about clinical-trial enrollment rather than research-channel sources.
Myth
Certepetide will work for any cancer.
Reality
The current clinical hypothesis is most directly applicable to tumors where drug-penetration is the rate-limiting barrier — pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (dense desmoplastic stroma, poor vasculature) and glioblastoma (blood-brain barrier and tumor vasculature challenges). The αv-integrin and neuropilin-1 expression profiles that drive certepetide's tumor-selectivity may not hold up uniformly across all tumor histologies. The development program is testing the hypothesis in PDAC and glioblastoma first, with broader solid-tumor extensions in earlier-stage development.
Myth
Certepetide and iRGD are the same thing.
Reality
They are closely related but distinct. iRGD is the Ruoslahti-group prototypic tumor-penetrating peptide (cyclic 9-residue CRGDKGPDC) that established the CendR mechanism in the foundational 2009-2010 papers. Certepetide is the chemically optimized clinical-development form of iRGD developed by Lisata Therapeutics — same fundamental two-step mechanism (αv-integrin binding plus neuropilin-1-mediated CendR pathway activation), but optimized for clinical pharmacokinetics, manufacturing, and regulatory development. The distinction is similar to how exenatide (the synthetic clinical drug) relates to exendin-4 (the venom-derived parent peptide) in the GLP-1 receptor agonist class.
Published Research
8 studiesLSTA1-GBM-2A: study protocol for an exploratory phase 2a randomised controlled trial evaluating tumour-homing peptide certepetide with temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme
Truusalu JP and colleagues, BMJ Open 2025. Study protocol for the Phase 2a glioblastoma trial of certepetide combined with temozolomide. Extends the certepetide development program from PDAC to glioblastoma — a second high-unmet-need indication where tumor-penetration biology is mechanistically relevant.
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Certepetide in Human Subjects With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Winning A and colleagues, Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development 2025. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of certepetide in metastatic PDAC patients — refines the exposure-dose framework for the BOLSTER Phase 3 trial design.
Assessment of the Pharmacokinetics, Disposition, and Duration of Action of the Tumour-Targeting Peptide CEND-1
Järveläinen HA and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023. Pharmacokinetic and disposition characterization of certepetide / CEND-1, including the duration of CendR pathway activation that informs the dosing schedule relative to chemotherapy administration.
Dual αV-integrin and neuropilin-1 targeting peptide CEND-1 plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre phase 1 study
Dean A and colleagues, Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2022. The Phase 1b first-in-human study of CEND-1 (certepetide) combined with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC patients. Established translation feasibility, acceptable safety, and encouraging efficacy signals that supported advancement to the BOLSTER Phase 3 trial.
Tumor-penetrating therapy for β5 integrin-rich pancreas cancer
Hurtado de Mendoza T and colleagues, Nature Communications 2021. Mechanism-extension paper establishing the β5 integrin upregulation in PDAC vasculature and the rationale for PDAC as a particularly suitable indication for tumor-penetrating peptide therapy.
De novo design of a tumor-penetrating peptide
Coadministration of a tumor-penetrating peptide enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs
Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Girard OM, Hanahan D, Mattrey RF, and Ruoslahti E, Science 2010. Extended the iRGD work to show that co-administration (without direct conjugation) enhances cancer drug efficacy in animal tumor models — the conceptual translational paper underlying certepetide's clinical positioning as a delivery enhancer for standard chemotherapy.
Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors
Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Greenwald DR, and Ruoslahti E, Cancer Cell 2009. Foundational paper from Ruoslahti's group at Sanford Burnham introducing the iRGD/CendR tissue-penetration mechanism. Established the conceptual basis for what became certepetide.
Quick Facts
- Class
- Tumor-Homing Peptide
- Tier
- C
- Evidence
- Moderate
- Safety
- Moderate Data
- Updated
- May 2026
- Citations
- 8PubMed
Also known as
Tags
Evidence Score
Clinical Trials
View Clinical TrialsLinks to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.