Skip to content

hMG

A urine-derived gonadotropin preparation containing both FSH and LH activity, used for ovulation induction and controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF — the original injectable fertility drug, still in use as Menopur and HP-hMG formulations.

BStrongWell-Studied
Last updated 8 citations

What is hMG?

Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) is a purified preparation of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) activity extracted from the urine of postmenopausal women, who excrete elevated gonadotropins as a consequence of ovarian failure. The original drug, Pergonal, was developed by Bruno Lunenfeld and Piero Donini in the late 1950s and remained for decades the only injectable gonadotropin available for treating infertility — used to induce ovulation in anovulatory women and to drive controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Modern formulations (Menopur, Repronex, Menogon) are highly purified menotropins (HP-hMG) with reduced contaminating urinary proteins, dosed by FSH content with a labeled 1:1 ratio of FSH to LH activity (the LH activity in commercial Menopur is supplied substantially as hCG rather than native LH, since hCG is co-purified from postmenopausal urine and binds the same LHCGR). hMG remains a clinically common alternative to recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation, particularly in protocols where supplemental LH activity is considered desirable (older patients, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, GnRH-antagonist cycles). In men, hMG is used adjunctively with hCG for fertility induction in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism when spermatogenesis fails to recover on hCG alone.

What hMG Is Investigated For

hMG has a single longstanding clinical center of gravity — gonadotropin-driven ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction — and a smaller adjunctive role in male fertility induction. The strongest evidence is the IVF/ICSI literature: dozens of randomized trials and several meta-analyses comparing HP-hMG (Menopur) to recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, Follistim) in controlled ovarian stimulation. The picture is genuinely mixed rather than one-sided. hMG produces fewer oocytes per cycle on average but is associated with comparable or slightly higher live-birth rates per started cycle in some meta-analyses, lower serum progesterone on the day of trigger (potentially favoring fresh-transfer endometrial receptivity), and a different ovarian-hyperstimulation-syndrome (OHSS) risk profile. In men, hMG combined with hCG can rescue spermatogenesis in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients who do not achieve adequate sperm counts on hCG monotherapy — a smaller evidence base but a clinically established adjunctive use. The honest caveats: hMG is a urine-derived biological with batch-to-batch variability that recombinant FSH does not have, and the LH activity in modern Menopur is substantially provided by co-purified hCG rather than native LH (a distinction that matters mechanistically and for some interpretations of the FSH-vs-hMG comparison literature). hMG is not used for TRT, weight loss, or any non-fertility indication — those are different drugs (hCG, gonadorelin, GLP-1 agonists).

Controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF
Strong90%
Ovulation induction in anovulatory infertility
Strong90%
Fertility induction in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (men)
Moderate70%
Adjunct to hCG when spermatogenesis is insufficient
Moderate70%

History & Discovery

The clinical history of hMG begins with the recognition in the 1930s and 1940s that postmenopausal women excrete elevated levels of gonadotropins — the consequence of ovarian failure removing the negative feedback that normally restrains pituitary FSH and LH secretion. In 1949, Italian physiologist Piero Donini at Serono developed a method for extracting and purifying gonadotropins from postmenopausal urine, an industrial-scale concept that depended on collecting large volumes of urine (initially from elderly women in convents in Italy, in a famous anecdote of pharmaceutical history). The clinical translation came through Bruno Lunenfeld in Israel, whose collaboration with Donini produced Pergonal, the first injectable hMG product. The first ovulation in an anovulatory woman achieved with hMG was reported in 1962, and the first pregnancy in 1962 — beginning the modern era of gonadotropin-based fertility treatment. Pergonal remained the standard for decades, used for ovulation induction in anovulatory women, controlled ovarian stimulation, and as one of the foundational drugs of early IVF following the first successful birth in 1978. Recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, follitropin alfa, approved 1995; Follistim, follitropin beta) eventually offered a non-urine-derived, batch-consistent alternative, and the comparative literature between rFSH and hMG became one of the most studied questions in reproductive endocrinology. In parallel, urinary preparations were progressively purified — moving from Pergonal (relatively crude) to highly purified menotropin products like Menopur (Ferring, approved 2002) with substantially reduced contaminating urinary proteins and SC-injection compatibility. Menopur became the dominant modern hMG formulation, often dosed alongside rFSH or as a standalone gonadotropin in IVF cycles, particularly in protocols where supplemental LH activity is considered advantageous (older patients, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, GnRH-antagonist cycles). In male reproduction, the discovery in the 1970s and 1980s that combined hCG (LH-mimetic) plus hMG (FSH + LH activity) could induce spermatogenesis in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients established hMG's adjunctive role in male fertility, where hCG monotherapy is the first-line approach but hMG is added when sperm counts remain inadequate. This combined-gonadotropin protocol remains the standard for fertility induction in male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism today.

How It Works

hMG provides the body with the two hormones (FSH and LH) that normally drive ovulation. By giving these as injections, doctors can encourage the ovaries to develop multiple eggs at once during IVF treatment, or to ovulate in women who don't ovulate on their own.

hMG supplies exogenous gonadotropic activity that mimics endogenous pituitary FSH and LH. FSH binds FSH receptors on ovarian granulosa cells, driving recruitment, growth, and selection of follicles, granulosa-cell proliferation, aromatase induction, and estradiol production. LH activity (via the LHCGR shared with hCG) binds theca cells to produce androgen substrate for aromatization, supports late-follicular maturation, and contributes to the final follicular environment. In men, the same dual FSH/LH signal supports both Sertoli-cell function (FSH-driven spermatogenesis) and Leydig-cell testosterone production (LH-driven), which is why combined hMG + hCG can produce spermatogenesis in hypogonadotropic men where hCG alone has been insufficient. A mechanistically important detail: in modern HP-hMG products (notably Menopur), the LH activity is supplied substantially as co-purified hCG rather than native pituitary LH. hCG and LH bind the same receptor but with different pharmacokinetics — hCG has a 24–36 hour half-life vs. minutes for LH — which contributes to a more sustained LH-receptor stimulus per dose. Trigger-day serum progesterone is consistently lower with hMG than with rFSH, attributed to a shift in granulosa-cell steroidogenesis from the Δ5 (pregnenolone → progesterone) toward the Δ4 pathway (pregnenolone → androstenedione), an effect of the hCG-driven LH activity on follicular steroid output.

Evidence Snapshot

Overall Confidence90%

Human Clinical Evidence

Strong. Decades of randomized controlled trials in IVF and ovulation induction; multiple meta-analyses comparing HP-hMG vs. recombinant FSH for live-birth and safety outcomes; established adjunctive role in male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Animal / Preclinical

Comprehensive. Gonadotropin biology and ovarian/testicular physiology are foundational topics with extensive preclinical characterization predating modern hMG products.

Mechanistic Rationale

Very strong. FSH and LH receptor pharmacology and follicular/spermatogenic physiology are among the best-characterized endocrine pathways.

Research Gaps & Open Questions

What the current literature has not yet settled about hMG:

  • 01Optimal patient subgroups for hMG vs. recombinant FSH — meta-analyses have generally not identified universal superiority, but specific subgroups (older patients, expected high responders, hypogonadotropic patients) where hMG has greater advantage continue to be characterized.
  • 02Mechanism of lower trigger-day progesterone with hMG — recent steroidogenesis-pathway analyses (Δ4 vs Δ5 shift) provide a mechanistic story, but its clinical impact on live birth rates in fresh-transfer cycles is not fully resolved.
  • 03Differential OHSS risk profile — recent post hoc analyses suggest hMG and rFSH may produce different OHSS risk in predicted high-responders, but adequately powered prospective comparative safety data is still accruing.
  • 04Long-term oncologic safety after repeated stimulation cycles — broadly reassuring evidence exists but very long-duration follow-up of patients exposed to multiple cycles in modern IVF practice continues to be characterized.
  • 05Optimal LH-supplementation strategy across protocols — whether the LH activity in hMG is best replicated by recombinant LH preparations, native hCG-driven LH activity, or co-administration with rFSH remains an active question in protocol design.
  • 06Adjunctive use in male fertility induction — combined hCG + hMG is established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, but optimal dose, duration, and patient selection are not standardized across centers.

Forms & Administration

Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of reconstituted lyophilized powder. Menopur is supplied as 75 IU or 1200 IU vials reconstituted with sterile sodium chloride solution. Dosing is by FSH content (typically 75–450 IU/day in IVF, individualized to ovarian response and titrated against serial ultrasound and estradiol monitoring). All injectable peptides should only be administered under the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider. Never self-administer without clinician oversight.

Dosing & Protocols

The ranges below reflect protocols commonly discussed in the literature and by clinicians — not a prescription. Actual dosing for any individual should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider who knows the patient.

Typical Range

For controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF: typically 150–300 IU per day of FSH activity, individualized to ovarian reserve, age, BMI, and prior response. Lower starting doses (75–150 IU/day) are common in expected high-responders or PCOS patients to mitigate OHSS risk. Higher starting doses (300–450 IU/day) are used for poor responders or patients with diminished ovarian reserve. For ovulation induction in anovulatory infertility (non-IVF): typically 75–150 IU/day, escalated stepwise based on follicular monitoring. For male fertility induction in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: 75–150 IU three times weekly, added to hCG monotherapy when spermatogenesis fails to recover.

Frequency

Once daily during ovarian stimulation, typically for 8–14 days until follicular maturation criteria are met and a final trigger (hCG or GnRH agonist) is administered. In male fertility induction, three-times-weekly dosing alongside hCG is the established protocol; treatment durations of 6–12 months or longer may be needed before sperm counts respond.

Timing Considerations

No specific timing requirements: can be administered at any time of day, with or without food, and is not tied to exercise timing. Consistency matters more than the specific clock — dose at roughly the same time each day (or same day each week, for weekly protocols) to keep exposure steady.

Cycle Length

Female stimulation cycles are 8–14 days per cycle. Multiple cycles may be undertaken until pregnancy or until clinical decision to discontinue. Male fertility-induction courses run 6–24 months; longer durations are sometimes required, particularly in men with prepubertal-onset hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Protocol Notes

hMG is exclusively a clinician-supervised drug used within structured fertility protocols. Self-directed use outside a fertility center is not appropriate. Reconstitution requires sterile diluent, careful handling of the lyophilized powder, and timing coordination with serial monitoring (transvaginal ultrasound, serum estradiol). Patients are typically trained on self-injection by clinic staff and dose adjustments are made by the prescribing physician based on monitoring findings. The choice between hMG and recombinant FSH is a clinical decision driven by patient profile, prior cycle response, protocol design, and clinic preference rather than universal superiority of either. Combination protocols using both hMG and rFSH are also common. OHSS risk is the most consequential safety consideration. Predicted high-responders (high antral follicle count, high AMH, PCOS phenotype) warrant lower starting doses, careful titration, and consideration of GnRH-agonist trigger or freeze-all strategies to mitigate OHSS risk. Recent comparative data suggests differential OHSS risk profiles between hMG and rFSH that depend on protocol details and patient subgroup.

hMG is FDA-approved for ovulation induction and assisted reproduction under clinician supervision. It is not appropriate for self-directed use, performance enhancement, weight loss, or any non-fertility application. Its safety depends on appropriate monitoring throughout the stimulation cycle.

Timeline of Effects

Onset

Follicular response on serum estradiol and ultrasound is detectable within 4–6 days of starting daily injections in most patients. Ovulation induction (if a trigger is given) follows 36 hours after hCG administration. In male fertility induction, sperm counts typically begin to respond after 3–6 months of combined hCG + hMG therapy.

Peak Effect

Peak follicular response in IVF stimulation is at the trigger day (typically days 8–14), at which point multiple mature follicles (15–18 mm or larger) and serum estradiol levels in the 1500–4000 pg/mL range are typical (highly individualized). In male fertility induction, peak sperm-count response may take 12–24 months and depends on baseline testicular reserve.

After Discontinuation

Ovarian function returns to baseline within days to weeks after stopping hMG; the next physiological menstrual cycle resumes assuming no pregnancy occurred. In male fertility induction, sperm production continues for some weeks after discontinuation but declines as gonadotropin-driven spermatogenesis subsides; in patients with permanent hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, ongoing therapy is required to maintain fertility.

Common Questions

Who hMG Is NOT For

Contraindications
  • Pregnancy — hMG is contraindicated once pregnancy is established; ongoing fertility treatment is paused.
  • Primary ovarian failure — hMG cannot rescue follicular response in patients without functional ovarian reserve; high baseline FSH levels indicate inadequate ovarian response is likely.
  • Uncontrolled thyroid or adrenal dysfunction — these must be optimized before initiating fertility treatment.
  • Pituitary tumor or other pathology elevating gonadotropins — workup should clarify the etiology before treatment.
  • Sex hormone–dependent cancers (breast, ovarian, uterine, prostate) — hMG-driven hormone elevations are contraindicated.
  • Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding — must be investigated first.
  • Ovarian cysts or enlargement not due to PCOS — must be evaluated before stimulation.
  • Known hypersensitivity to hMG, urinary-derived proteins, or formulation excipients.

Drug & Supplement Interactions

hMG has a relatively limited drug-interaction profile because its action is on specific gonadotropin receptors with a defined endocrine pathway. Concurrent GnRH agonists (leuprolide, triptorelin) and GnRH antagonists (cetrorelix, ganirelix) are used in combination by design to control endogenous LH surges during IVF stimulation, and hMG dosing is calibrated against these protocol elements. For patients with PCOS undergoing combination protocols with letrozole or clomiphene, the addition of hMG to oral ovulation-induction agents is a recognized escalation strategy when monotherapy has not achieved ovulation. Recent network meta-analyses have characterized clinical pregnancy rates with various combinations. Concurrent androgens or estrogens that affect hypothalamic-pituitary feedback can theoretically alter response, but most fertility patients are not on such agents. Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors used in oncology contexts have specific interactions with ovarian stimulation that fall outside routine hMG use. Patients on corticosteroids for autoimmune indications should generally continue them through stimulation cycles under specialist guidance. As always, full medication disclosure to the fertility specialist before initiating gonadotropin therapy is essential.

Safety Profile

Safety Information

Common Side Effects

Injection-site reactionsHeadacheAbdominal pain or bloatingMood changesNauseaOvarian enlargement during stimulation cycles

Cautions

  • Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) — significant in high-responder patients, requires monitoring
  • Risk of multiple pregnancy if pregnancy occurs during ovulation-induction cycles
  • Requires close monitoring with transvaginal ultrasound and serum estradiol during stimulation
  • Use only under fertility-specialist supervision
  • Urinary-derived product — theoretical (extremely low) risk of trace protein contaminants

What We Don't Know

Long-term oncologic safety after multiple stimulation cycles has been studied with broadly reassuring findings; cumulative effects of repeated high-dose gonadotropin exposure across many cycles in modern IVF practice continue to accrue data.

Myths & Misconceptions

Myth

hMG and recombinant FSH are interchangeable — there is no real difference.

Reality

They are not identical. hMG (urinary-derived) contains both FSH and LH activity (with the LH activity in modern Menopur supplied substantially as co-purified hCG); recombinant FSH contains only FSH. Trigger-day serum progesterone is lower with hMG (a steroidogenesis-pathway effect), oocyte yields tend to be slightly lower, and live birth rates are comparable in most meta-analyses. The two are clinically reasonable alternatives, but they have meaningfully different pharmacology and the choice should be made by the prescribing fertility specialist based on patient-level factors.

Myth

hMG is outdated because recombinant FSH is more modern.

Reality

Recombinant FSH is newer technology, but newer is not synonymous with better. Highly purified hMG (Menopur) remains a first-line option in IVF stimulation in many clinics, with a continuing place in protocols where supplemental LH activity is considered advantageous. The comparative literature does not show a clear universal winner. Both are widely used.

Myth

hMG can be used for testosterone replacement or muscle building.

Reality

hMG is a fertility drug. While it does contain LH activity that can stimulate testicular testosterone production, it is not labeled for, used for, or appropriate for TRT or athletic performance. Off-label use for these purposes runs unnecessary risks of OHSS-equivalent ovarian effects in females, gynecomastia and testicular changes in males, and is medically inappropriate when better-targeted alternatives exist (testosterone for TRT, hCG monotherapy or clomiphene for testicular stimulation in men). hMG is also explicitly prohibited by WADA in athletic contexts.

Myth

Because hMG is derived from urine, it is a 'natural' product with minimal risk.

Reality

hMG is a biologically active gonadotropin preparation that drives ovarian and testicular function and carries real, well-characterized risks — OHSS, multiple pregnancy, ovarian torsion, and the consequences of overstimulation. Urinary origin is a manufacturing detail; clinical risk profile is determined by the pharmacological action, not the source material.

Myth

All hMG products are the same — Pergonal, Menopur, Repronex, and the rest are interchangeable.

Reality

Modern HP-hMG products are substantially purer than original Pergonal, with reduced contaminating urinary protein content and SC-injection compatibility. Different brands have somewhat different specific FSH:LH activity ratios and excipient profiles. Pergonal is no longer marketed in the US, having been replaced by Menopur and Repronex. Brand-equivalent dosing assumptions should not be made without confirming the specific product label.

Published Research

8 studies

Luteinizing hormone activity in ovarian stimulation: comparative efficacy and safety of gonadotropins versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

Meta-AnalysisPMID: 42100203

Impact of gonadotropin selection on risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in predicted high responders

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 41054720

Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Women Undergoing Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Using Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Dydrogesterone, and Progesterone

Clinical TrialPMID: 40552092

Clinical efficacy and safety of two highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins in women undergoing in vitro fertilization

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 40445794

Effect of letrozole doses on clinical pregnancy rates in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Meta-AnalysisPMID: 40418644

Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis

Randomized Controlled TrialPMID: 38037188

Highly Purified Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (Menopur®): A Profile of Its Use in Infertility

Comprehensive 2018 profile of Menopur — composition, mechanism, dosing, and pivotal IVF and ovulation-induction trial evidence. The reference Menopur monograph for clinicians.

ReviewPMID: 30264288

Clinical efficacy of highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

2010 meta-analysis pooling head-to-head HP-hMG vs. rFSH (Gonal-F) IVF/ICSI trials. Did not support clinical superiority of recombinant FSH over highly purified hMG — a foundational result in the gonadotropin choice literature.

Meta-AnalysisPMID: 20389096

Quick Facts

Class
Urinary Gonadotropin (FSH + LH)
Tier
B
Evidence
Strong
Safety
Well-Studied
Updated
May 2026
Citations
8PubMed

Also known as

Human Menopausal GonadotropinMenotropinMenotropinsMenopurRepronexPergonalMenogonHP-hMGHighly Purified Menotropin

Tags

HormonalFertilityGonadotropinFDA-ApprovedIVF

Related Goals

Conditions Discussed

Evidence Score

Overall Confidence90%

Clinical Trials

View Clinical Trials

Links to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.