Skip to content

Vialox

A synthetic pentapeptide (Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2) used in anti-wrinkle creams and described as a curare-like blocker of the muscle acetylcholine receptor. Its headline claim of up to 49% smaller wrinkles in 28 days is unpublished manufacturer data.

DPreliminaryLimited Data
Last updated 21 citations

What is Vialox?

Vialox (Pentapeptide-3) is a synthetic pentapeptide (GPRPA) sold by Pentapharm (now part of dsm-firmenich) as a topical cosmeceutical for reducing expression wrinkles. It is often marketed as inspired by Temple Pit Viper venom, but its sequence does not occur anywhere in waglerin-1, the 22-residue viper toxin it is usually linked to; the waglerin-1 mimic in Pentapharm's range is its sister ingredient Syn-Ake. The same molecule was first patented in 1990 by Behringwerke as a blocker of blood-clot formation, and the earliest cosmetic patent (2004) calls it 'curare-like'. Vialox acts as a competitive antagonist at the muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), blocking the signal that tells facial muscles to contract. A 71% drop in contractions one minute after adding it to cultured muscle cells circulates widely as a Pentapharm figure, but it appears in no retrievable primary document — not in either patent, not in the reviews that discuss Vialox, and not in any supplier datasheet still available. The only published version of that experiment is a 2004 patent testing the same molecule at 0.3% in a nerve-muscle co-culture, which found contraction frequency fell 69.75% at one minute and 60.75% at two hours. Pentapharm also reported that a cream containing 5% Vialox reduced wrinkle size by up to 49% and skin roughness by up to 47% after 28 days, but that study was never published and its number of volunteers is unknown. Unlike injectable Botox, Vialox is applied topically with gentler, partial muscle relaxation.

What Vialox Is Investigated For

Vialox is investigated as a topical cosmeceutical anti-wrinkle active described as a curare-like, postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist to reduce dynamic expression wrinkles. The only efficacy figures are unpublished Pentapharm data, relayed through a 2013 patent application from another company and later reviews: up to 49% smaller wrinkles and 47% less skin roughness after 28 days of a cream containing 5% Vialox. A widely repeated 71% drop in contractions of cultured muscle cells after one minute has no retrievable primary document at all; the only published figure of that kind, 69.75% at one minute, comes from a 2004 patent. The number of volunteers, use of a placebo, and measurement method were never reported. The honest caveats are significant. Efficacy claims rest almost entirely on manufacturer-sponsored studies that have not been independently replicated in peer-reviewed trials, and the headline 49% figure sits at the high end of cosmetic peptide claims — real-world effects at typical product concentrations are substantially more variable. No published binding or electrophysiology study has tested Vialox at the human nicotinic receptor, and whether the pentapeptide actually reaches neuromuscular junctions in facial musculature at meaningful concentrations from topical application remains the central unresolved question. The 'natural Botox' marketing framing overstates magnitude — Phase 3 trials of injectable botulinum toxin report 4-week responder rates of roughly 71% to 95% depending on product and endpoint, and no study has compared any of them head-to-head with topical Vialox.

Dynamic wrinkle reduction (forehead, crow's feet)
Preliminary30%
Non-injectable alternative to Botox
Preliminary30%
Synergistic combination with Argireline and Syn-Ake
Limited15%

History & Discovery

Vialox was sold by Pentapharm, a Basel, Switzerland company, and was already in its patent-protected cosmetic actives range when DSM agreed to buy Pentapharm in July 2007; the business is now part of dsm-firmenich. The molecule is older than the brand, and older than that patent. Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro is the classic fibrin 'knob A' peptide, characterized in the peer-reviewed literature from 1984 onward as an inhibitor of fibrinogen aggregation. GPRPA-NH2 is the only fully worked example in a 1990 Behringwerke patent on peptide amides that prevent blood clotting, filed by Werner Stueber and Karl Fickenscher with a priority date of 8 May 1990; the application was later withdrawn and the family is now assigned to Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. The molecule went on to be used as a fibrin-aggregation inhibitor in blood-test reagents. Cosmetic use was described in a patent filed in December 2004 by the Swiss company Labo Cosprophar AG — inventors Daniela Montanari and Manuela Guglielmo, granted 7 December 2010 and since expired for non-payment — which called the pentapeptide 'curare-like' and said it competes with acetylcholine for its receptor. That patent tested it in a nerve-muscle cell co-culture and in an uncontrolled 20-day questionnaire study in 40 women using a finished product named Botoina. Notably, the patent that actually ran the muscle experiments never mentions waglerin, snake venom, or Tropidolaemus wagleri anywhere. Many reviews and a 2013 patent application describe Vialox as a snake-venom or waglerin-1 fragment, but the GPRPA sequence does not occur in waglerin-1 — the waglerin-1 mimic in Pentapharm's range is Syn-Ake. The route by which that error became a citable fact is traceable in four steps. A 2013 US patent application from Syneuro LLC asserted in its background section, with no citation, that Vialox is 'a pentapeptide fragment of the neurotoxin waglerin-1'. A 2017 peer-reviewed review in the journal Cosmetics then repeated the snake-venom derivation and the 49%/47% wrinkle figures, citing that patent as its source. A widely cited 2020 review in Frontiers in Chemistry cited the 2017 review, as did at least one major research-chemical supplier's product page. By 2026 a cell-culture paper was stating the venom derivation as established fact. No step in the chain adds evidence; each adds authority. Vialox was positioned as a topical alternative to Botox for expression lines. Independent academic literature on it remains thin: a 2020 review noted that the only available efficacy data were provided by the manufacturer, and the two peer-reviewed papers since (2026) are computer-docking and cell-culture studies. Vialox no longer appears in dsm-firmenich's current skin bioactives list, which still includes Syn-Ake.

How It Works

When you frown or squint, nerves release acetylcholine to make facial muscles contract. Over years, these repeated contractions create permanent wrinkles. Vialox sits on the muscle's acetylcholine receptor like a key that fits but doesn't turn, blocking the real signal. The muscles partially relax, and the wrinkles they create soften and smooth out.

Vialox (H-Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2; amidated C-terminus; molecular weight 495.6) is a synthetic pentapeptide. Its sequence is not part of waglerin-1, and it cannot be an active fragment of it even in principle. Waglerin-1 is 22 residues, GGKPDLRPCHPPCHYIPRPKPR; GPRPA appears nowhere in that string. Structure-function work on the toxin showed that a fragment containing residues 6 to 22 was non-toxic, so bioactivity requires one or more of the first five residues — which are GGKPD, not GPRPA — and that replacing the two half-cystines with alanine also abolished toxicity, meaning the single intramolecular disulfide bond is essential. GPRPA contains no cysteine. The identical molecule was instead first described as a fibrin-polymerization inhibitor: Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro is the classic fibrin 'knob A' peptide characterized in the 1980s and 1990s, and a 1990 Behringwerke patent by Werner Stueber and Karl Fickenscher worked up GPRPA-NH2 specifically as a peptide amide that prevents clot formation, for pharmaceutical or diagnostic use. That patent mentions no cosmetic use, no wrinkles, and no acetylcholine receptor. It is claimed to act as a competitive antagonist at the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), competing with acetylcholine for its binding site; its binding site and subunit selectivity have never been characterized. By occupying the acetylcholine binding site on the postsynaptic membrane, Vialox prevents sodium channel opening, blocks membrane depolarization, and inhibits muscle contraction. The in vitro figure usually quoted — 71% fewer contractions one minute after adding it to cultured muscle cells — traces to no retrievable primary source. The only published version of the test, a 2004 Labo Cosprophar patent, used a nerve-muscle co-culture and reported 69.75% fewer contractions after one minute and 60.75% after two hours at 0.3%. No binding assay, electrophysiology recording, or subunit-selectivity study of Vialox at any nicotinic receptor has ever been published, so 'competitive antagonist' remains an assertion carried forward from that patent rather than a measured property. Manufacturer in vivo figure, with an unpublished design: up to 49% smaller wrinkles and 47% less roughness after 28 days of a cream containing 5% Vialox. This postsynaptic mechanism is complementary to presynaptic approaches: Argireline and SNAP-8 inhibit SNARE complex assembly, while Pentapeptide-18 mimics enkephalins to reduce catecholamine release. Combining pre- and postsynaptic peptides targets multiple nodes of neuromuscular transmission.

Evidence Snapshot

Overall Confidence25%

Human Clinical Evidence

Very limited. No controlled human study of Vialox has been published or registered. The 49% and 47% figures are manufacturer claims with sample size not reported. The only published human data on the molecule is an uncontrolled 20-day questionnaire in 40 women using a multi-ingredient product (1% pentapeptide plus anise extract, magnesium gluconate, and a dipeptide), in which 75% said they noticed fewer expression wrinkles.

Animal / Preclinical

Limited. Contraction counts in cultured nerve-muscle cells are the entire preclinical base: the Cosprophar patent at 0.3% reported 69.75% at one minute and 60.75% at two hours, and the widely quoted 71%-at-one-minute manufacturer figure has no retrievable primary document. Independent work comes from one Istanbul University group and is computer docking plus cell tests: no toxicity to HaCaT skin cells up to 1 mg/mL, and cytotoxic effects in breast and prostate cancer cell lines. No animal studies were found.

Mechanistic Rationale

Weak. Receptor blocking is inferred from contraction counts in cultured cells, not from binding or electrophysiology data. The peptide is highly water-loving (computed XLogP −3.4) and close to 500 Da, so whether it crosses intact skin and reaches facial muscle is the key uncertainty.

Research Gaps & Open Questions

What the current literature has not yet settled about Vialox:

  • 01Independent, non-industry-funded human trials on Vialox specifically — the existing efficacy claims (49% wrinkle-depth reduction at 28 days) are dominated by Pentapharm/DSM-associated studies and have not been replicated in peer-reviewed independent trials.
  • 02Direct head-to-head comparisons with botulinum toxin (the implicit comparator), Argireline, Syn-Ake, and Pentapeptide-18 at matched concentrations and durations.
  • 03Real-world skin-penetration and target-site quantification — whether the pentapeptide actually reaches nAChRs in facial musculature in clinically meaningful concentrations from topical application is the central unresolved question.
  • 04Basic pharmacology — there is no published binding, electrophysiology, or subunit-selectivity study of Vialox at human (or any) nicotinic receptors; the receptor-blocking claim rests on contraction counts in cultured cells.
  • 05No registered clinical trials — ClinicalTrials.gov lists no studies of Vialox or pentapeptide-3, and the 28-day manufacturer study has never been published with its design, sample size, or controls.
  • 06Wet-laboratory tests of the computer-predicted targets (SIRT-1, MMP-1/8/13) from 2025 and 2026 docking studies — none has been checked in skin cells or tissue.
  • 07Ingredient identity — the EU CosIng definition of pentapeptide-3 lists isoleucine, which the marketed GPRPA sequence lacks, so label identity and purity across suppliers are unverified.
  • 08Long-term human data — most published work spans 28-day windows; multi-month and multi-year continuous use has not been studied as a distinct safety or efficacy question.
  • 09Whether stacking Vialox with Syn-Ake produces additive benefit or redundant nAChR occupancy — the marketing pitch is synergy, but mechanism overlap suggests redundancy is at least as likely.

Forms & Administration

Vialox is used topically in cosmeceutical formulations. No manufacturer use level is publicly documented; patent examples use 0.3% to 1% pentapeptide by weight, and the manufacturer's 28-day claim used a cream containing 5% Vialox without saying whether that meant pure peptide or a supplied preparation. Often combined with Argireline, Syn-Ake, and/or Matrixyl for multi-target anti-aging. Applied to clean skin, typically twice daily. No prescription required.

Dosing & Protocols

The ranges below reflect protocols commonly discussed in the literature and by clinicians — not a prescription. Actual dosing for any individual should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider who knows the patient.

Typical Range

No public manufacturer use level exists for Vialox. Patent examples put the pure pentapeptide at 0.3% to 1% of the finished product (with a claimed range of 0.001% to 5%), and the manufacturer's 28-day wrinkle claim used a cream containing 5% Vialox without saying whether that meant pure peptide or a supplied preparation.

Frequency

Applied topically once or twice daily to clean skin, targeting expression-line areas (forehead, glabella, crow's feet). The manufacturer's 28-day protocol was never published; the 2004 patent's questionnaire study ran 20 days.

Timing Considerations

No specific timing requirements: can be administered at any time of day, with or without food, and is not tied to exercise timing. Consistency matters more than the specific clock — dose at roughly the same time each day (or same day each week, for weekly protocols) to keep exposure steady.

Cycle Length

Continuous indefinite use. Vialox is a maintenance cosmetic active — the competitive, reversible nAChR antagonism only operates while peptide is present at the receptor, so measurable benefit requires continued application. No cycling strategy is described in the cosmetic literature.

Protocol Notes

Skin penetration is the central practical caveat. The synthetic pentapeptide is very water-loving (computed XLogP −3.4, molecular weight 495.6) and faces the same stratum corneum barrier as other cosmetic peptides. The pharmacological target — nicotinic receptors at neuromuscular junctions in facial muscle — sits well below the epidermal layers that topical peptides typically reach, which is the gap between the laboratory figures (69.75% fewer contractions at one minute and 60.75% at two hours at 0.3% in the patent test, in cultured nerve-muscle cells rather than intact tissue) and modest effects in people. Vialox is commonly stacked with Argireline (presynaptic SNARE-complex inhibition) on the rationale that hitting the neuromuscular junction from both sides should add up. It is also frequently combined with Syn-Ake, but both are claimed to block the same postsynaptic receptor, so that stack risks redundancy rather than additive benefit. Pairing with matrikine peptides (Matrixyl, Syn-Coll) combines independent mechanisms more cleanly. Read labels carefully: pentapeptide-3 (Vialox) is a different ingredient from Matrixyl (palmitoyl-KTTKS), which has been called palmitoyl pentapeptide-3 and is now labeled palmitoyl pentapeptide-4.

Vialox is a cosmetic ingredient, not a drug. It is not FDA-approved to treat or prevent any medical condition, and cosmetic claims permitted on labels are limited to appearance-related language. Do not inject cosmetic peptide products — there is no authorized injectable category for Vialox and documented infection risk exists for unlicensed injection of cosmetic peptides.

Timeline of Effects

Onset

No published time-course exists. The only reported endpoints are the manufacturer's 28-day figures and the 2004 patent's 20-day questionnaire. Immediate 'tightening' or smoothing sensations within minutes of application come from film-forming polymers and humectants in the vehicle, not from real-time receptor blockade.

Peak Effect

The only reported endpoint is the manufacturer's 28-day figure of up to 49% smaller wrinkle size and 47% less skin roughness with a cream containing 5% Vialox; volunteer numbers and methods were not published. For comparison, Phase 3 trials of injectable botulinum toxin report responder rates at 4 weeks in the range of roughly 71% to 95% depending on product and endpoint; no study has compared any of them with topical Vialox.

After Discontinuation

How quickly any effect fades after stopping has never been measured. If the receptor-blocking mechanism is real, it is reversible, so continued use would be needed to maintain any benefit. There is no described withdrawal or rebound pattern.

Common Questions

Is pentapeptide-3 the same as Matrixyl or palmitoyl pentapeptide?

No. Pentapeptide-3 is the INCI name for Vialox (Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2), a peptide claimed to relax muscles. Matrixyl is palmitoyl-KTTKS, a collagen-signaling peptide that has been called palmitoyl pentapeptide-3 and is now labeled palmitoyl pentapeptide-4. The names are close enough that some supplier pages confuse them, so check the full ingredient name on the label.

Does Vialox do anything besides relax muscles, such as protect collagen?

Only in computer models so far. A 2026 Istanbul University study docked Vialox against collagen-degrading enzymes (MMP-1, -8, -13) and the longevity protein SIRT-1 and found it preferentially targeted SIRT-1, but it did not test whether Vialox changes these enzymes in cells or skin. The same study found Vialox was not toxic to human skin cells at up to 1 mg/mL.

How does Vialox compare to Syn-Ake?

Both are sold as blockers of the muscle acetylcholine receptor, but only Syn-Ake is modeled on the Temple Pit Viper toxin waglerin-1. Vialox is a pentapeptide (GPRPA) usually described as curare-like; Syn-Ake is a small three-residue derivative (dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate). Both block the acetylcholine receptor on muscle cells (postsynaptic), but with different binding characteristics. Vialox's 49% figure is an unpublished manufacturer claim; Syn-Ake's headline 82% figure is a drop in how often cultured, nerve-connected muscle cells twitched after 2 hours, not a wrinkle result. They are often combined, but because both are claimed to block the same receptor, there is no evidence the pair works better than either alone.

How does Vialox compare to Argireline?

They work at different points. Argireline blocks neurotransmitter release from the nerve (presynaptic — SNARE complex inhibition). Vialox blocks the receptor on the muscle (postsynaptic — nAChR competitive antagonism). Combining both is marketed as hitting the neuromuscular junction from both sides, which is mechanistically tidy, but no study has tested Vialox and Argireline together. The closest real evidence is for a different pair: pentapeptide-18 with acetyl hexapeptide-3, where the combination outperformed either alone in a supplier-reported comparison.

Does Vialox contain snake venom?

No. Vialox is fully synthetic, manufactured in a lab. Despite frequent 'snake venom peptide' marketing, its sequence (GPRPA) does not occur in waglerin-1, the Temple Pit Viper toxin it is usually linked to; the venom-modeled ingredient in the same range is Syn-Ake. GPRPA-NH2 was first made in 1990 as a reagent that stops fibrin clots from forming, and it contains no animal-derived ingredients.

How realistic is the 49% wrinkle-reduction claim?

The 49% figure is a Pentapharm claim that was never published as a study. It reaches the literature second-hand: a 2013 patent application from another company says a 28-day application of a cream containing 5% Vialox 'reduces wrinkle size up to 49% and skin roughness up to 47%', and reviews cite that patent. Volunteer numbers, placebo use, and the measurement method are not reported. It has not been independently replicated in peer-reviewed trials and sits at the high end of cosmetic peptide claims. No systematic review has ever assessed Vialox: the 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of peptides for skin aging screened 19 randomized trials and did not mention Vialox or pentapeptide-3 once, because there is no Vialox trial to screen. Real-world results at typical 0.05–0.3% product concentrations are substantially more variable, and most users describe subtle softening of expression lines rather than near-halving of wrinkle depth. For context, Phase 3 trials of injectable botulinum toxin report 4-week responder rates of roughly 71% to 95% depending on product and endpoint; no study has compared any of them with topical Vialox.

Is 'pentapeptide-3V' a stronger version of Vialox?

There is no such ingredient. 'Pentapeptide-3V' has no EU CosIng entry, no PubChem record, and no supplier specification — it appears only on content-farm pages written to rank for peptide dosing queries. Two genuine registered names exist and are different from each other: PENTAPEPTIDE-3 (CosIng 58978, the Vialox sequence) and SH-PENTAPEPTIDE-3 (CosIng 92241, added in November 2014), which is a separate ingredient. If a label or a certificate of analysis says 'pentapeptide-3V', treat that as a signal about the seller rather than about the molecule.

What CAS number should a certificate of analysis show?

Two circulate legitimately because the material is usually supplied as a salt. The free base, Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2, is CAS 135679-88-8 with molecular formula C21H37N9O5 and molecular weight 495.6. The diacetate salt, which is what most commercial material actually is, has its own identifier and a formula of C25H45N9O9 at molecular weight 615.7. A certificate quoting either is plausible; one quoting neither, or quoting a weight far from 495.6 for material sold as the free base, is worth questioning. Note also that the EU CosIng definition of pentapeptide-3 lists isoleucine among its amino acids, which the marketed GPRPA sequence does not contain — an unresolved inconsistency in the official inventory itself.

Why do some papers describe Vialox as an anticancer peptide?

Because a 2026 in vitro screen tested it that way, not because it has any oncology use. That study reported cytotoxic effects in breast (MDA-MB-231) and prostate (PC3) cancer cell lines alongside docking and ADMET predictions. Cell-line cytotoxicity at laboratory concentrations is a routine early screening result and says nothing about activity in a person, let alone about a cream. It is worth knowing the finding exists, because the phrase gets quoted out of context; the same research group's abstract also misdescribes a different peptide's origin, so its identity statements should be read cautiously.

How long until I see results, and what happens if I stop using it?

No published time-course exists: the only reported endpoints are the manufacturer's 28-day figures and a 20-day questionnaire in the 2004 patent, and how quickly any effect fades after stopping has never been measured. If the receptor-blocking mechanism is real, it is reversible, so benefits would be expected to recede once application stops. Vialox is best thought of as a maintenance cosmetic active rather than a one-time treatment, and there is no described withdrawal or rebound pattern.

Who Vialox Is NOT For

Contraindications
  • •Broken, irritated, or actively inflamed skin — wait until the skin barrier is intact before applying cosmetic peptide serums; application to compromised skin increases irritation potential and any systemic absorption.
  • •Known hypersensitivity to Vialox or to other components of the cosmetic vehicle (preservatives, fragrances, emulsifiers); contact dermatitis is uncommon but reported.
  • •Pregnancy and breastfeeding — topical cosmetic use on intact skin is generally considered low-risk, but there is no dedicated safety data in pregnancy, and the receptor-targeting mechanism makes a conservative default to minimize use during this window reasonable.
  • •Pediatric use — no data and no clinical reason for children or adolescents to use anti-wrinkle peptides.
  • •Do not inject cosmetic Vialox preparations — these are not sterile injectable products, not manufactured under injectable standards, and there is no clinical basis for injection.
  • •Patients with pre-existing neuromuscular disorders (myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome) should consult a clinician before using nAChR-targeting cosmetic peptides, even though systemic exposure from topical use is expected to be negligible.

Drug & Supplement Interactions

Documented pharmacological drug interactions for topical Vialox are minimal. Systemic absorption from typical topical use is low enough that meaningful interaction with oral or injected medications is not expected. The practical interaction space is topical layering with other actives. Vialox is compatible with most cosmetic ingredients — niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, ceramides, and other peptides layer readily. Co-formulation with Argireline is common and marketed as synergistic on the rationale that pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms hit different points in the same neuromuscular cascade. Stacking with Syn-Ake is common but raises a redundancy question — both Vialox and Syn-Ake target the postsynaptic nAChR, so additive benefit is theoretically capped. Layering with matrikine peptides (Matrixyl, Syn-Coll) combines independent mechanisms. High-concentration L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is acidic enough that concurrent same-layer application can destabilize peptide actives and is typically used at a different time of day. Strong AHA/BHA exfoliation on the same evening as Vialox can reduce peptide activity at the surface and increase irritation, so spacing is sensible. There is no documented concern with oral medications, systemic hormones, or anticoagulants at the level of topical cosmetic exposure. Patients receiving botulinum toxin injection generally do not need to stop Vialox beforehand.

Safety Profile

Safety Information

Common Side Effects

No published patch-test or sensitization data; manufacturer summaries report no adverse effectsIn laboratory tests it was not toxic to human skin cells (HaCaT keratinocytes) at up to 1 mg/mL

Cautions

  • • Not FDA-approved as a drug — marketed as a cosmeceutical ingredient
  • • Clinical data are unpublished manufacturer figures; no peer-reviewed human study of Vialox exists
  • • Topical efficacy limited by skin penetration — not as potent as injectable neurotoxins
  • • No published study has measured Vialox binding at the human nicotinic receptor; the receptor-blocking claim rests on contraction counts in cultured nerve-muscle cells

What We Don't Know

Long-term effects of chronic topical nAChR antagonism on facial muscles are unstudied. Whether meaningful receptor blockade occurs through intact skin at cosmeceutical concentrations is debated. Independent clinical replication beyond manufacturer data is limited.

Myths & Misconceptions

Myth

The 'pentapeptide-3' on my serum label is the same collagen peptide as Matrixyl.

Reality

Pentapeptide-3 is Vialox, a claimed muscle-relaxing peptide (Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2). Matrixyl is palmitoyl-KTTKS, once called palmitoyl pentapeptide-3 and now palmitoyl pentapeptide-4. They are different molecules with different claimed mechanisms.

Myth

Vialox is 'natural Botox' and produces comparable results to injection.

Reality

The marketing framing is misleading. Vialox is claimed to block the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; botulinum toxin enzymatically cleaves SNARE proteins inside nerve terminals to abolish acetylcholine release entirely. Phase 3 trials of injectable botulinum toxin report 4-week responder rates of roughly 71% to 95% depending on product and endpoint, while Vialox's 49% claim is unpublished manufacturer data that has never been assessed in any systematic review because no Vialox trial exists. Vialox does not substitute for injection.

Myth

Vialox contains real snake venom.

Reality

Vialox is a fully synthetic pentapeptide manufactured in a lab. It contains no animal material, and despite the marketing it is not a venom fragment either: its sequence (GPRPA) does not occur in waglerin-1, the Temple Pit Viper toxin it is usually linked to. The waglerin-1 mimic in the same product family is Syn-Ake, and the earliest cosmetic patent on GPRPA-NH2 calls it 'curare-like'.

Myth

Manufacturer's 49% wrinkle-reduction figure means Vialox nearly halves wrinkle appearance for any user.

Reality

The figure is a manufacturer claim of up to 49% smaller wrinkle size after 28 days with a cream containing 5% Vialox; the study's size, controls, and measurement method were never published, and 'up to' describes the best responder, not the average.

Myth

Stacking Vialox with Syn-Ake doubles the muscle-relaxing effect.

Reality

Vialox and Syn-Ake are both claimed to target the postsynaptic muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Stacking them likely produces redundant occupancy of the same target rather than additive benefit. Combining a postsynaptic blocker with a presynaptic inhibitor (Argireline, SNAP-8, or Pentapeptide-18) is mechanistically more complementary, but clinical evidence that multi-peptide stacks meaningfully outperform a single well-formulated cosmetic peptide is limited.

Myth

Vialox is a fragment of waglerin-1, the Temple Pit Viper toxin.

Reality

This is the most widely repeated claim about Vialox and it is not merely unsupported — it is impossible. Waglerin-1 is 22 residues long (GGKPDLRPCHPPCHYIPRPKPR) and the GPRPA sequence appears nowhere in it. Structure-function work on the toxin showed that a fragment spanning residues 6 to 22 was non-toxic, meaning activity requires one or more of the first five residues, which are GGKPD. The same work showed that substituting alanine for the two half-cystines abolished toxicity, so the intramolecular disulfide bond is essential — and GPRPA contains no cysteine. The sequence is in fact the fibrin 'knob A' peptide, described as a clotting inhibitor in 1984 and patented as one in 1990, years before anyone applied it to skin.

Myth

Vialox is a current dsm-firmenich ingredient.

Reality

It no longer appears in the company's published skin bioactives catalogue, which still lists Syn-Ake and Erythrulose from the same acquired Pentapharm range. DSM agreed to buy Pentapharm in July 2007 and the business is now part of dsm-firmenich, but material sold as Vialox today generally comes from other suppliers, and at least one peer-reviewed comparison table attributes the trade name to a US finished-goods brand rather than to Pentapharm at all. Anyone relying on originator-grade specification should confirm who actually made the material in hand.

Myth

Vialox can be safely injected for a stronger effect.

Reality

Cosmetic Vialox preparations are not sterile injectable products, not manufactured under injectable standards, and there is no authorized injectable category. Injecting non-sterile cosmetic material into the face carries documented infection risk: the published facial nontuberculous-mycobacterial case reports involve dermal fillers, autologous fat, and mesotherapy rather than cosmetic peptides specifically, but the hazard is the route and the sterility, not the molecule.

Published Research

21 studies

In Vitro and In Silico Assessment of Anticancer Activity of Venom-Derived and Biomimetic Neurotransmitter Inhibitor Pentapeptides.

PreclinicalPMID: 42412310

Integrative In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation of Vialox and Leuphasyl Pentapeptides for Antiaging Applications.

PreclinicalPMID: 42116636

Oral and topical peptides for skin aging: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of peptides for skin aging — 19 randomized trials, 1,341 participants, Cochrane RoB 2. It is cited here for what it does not contain: neither Vialox nor pentapeptide-3 appears anywhere in it, because no randomized trial of Vialox exists to include.

Systematic ReviewPMID: 41924746

Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in Cosmeceuticals-A Review of Skin Permeability and Efficacy.

Cited for its comparison table, which describes pentapeptide-3 as designed to act like tubocurarine, the active compound in curare. Read with care: this review also reports a 49% reduction in wrinkle depth, but for 10% acetyl hexapeptide-8, not for Vialox. Two unrelated 49% figures circulate in this literature and are routinely conflated.

ReviewPMID: 40565185

Peptides: Emerging Candidates for the Prevention and Treatment of Skin Senescence: A Review.

ReviewPMID: 39858482

Anti-ageing peptides and proteins for topical applications: a review.

ReviewPMID: 34957891

Cosmeceutical Peptides in the Framework of Sustainable Wellness Economy.

Errante and colleagues, Frontiers in Chemistry 2020 — notes that there are no independent investigations of Vialox's anti-wrinkle properties and that the only available data are provided by the manufacturer.

ReviewPMID: 33195061

The Effects of a Novel Series of KTTKS Analogues on Cytotoxicity and Proteolytic Activity.

PreclinicalPMID: 31618846

Role of topical peptides in preventing or treating aged skin.

ReviewPMID: 19570099

Binding of Ni2+ and Cu2+ ions to peptides with a Cys-His motif.

PreclinicalPMID: 18827939

Cosmeceutical peptides.

ReviewPMID: 18045359

Identification of residues at the alpha and epsilon subunit interfaces mediating species selectivity of Waglerin-1 for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

PreclinicalPMID: 11724791

Waglerin-1 selectively blocks the epsilon form of the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

What real, characterized nicotinic antagonism looks like, for contrast with Vialox. Waglerin-1 reduced the mouse end-plate response to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine with an IC50 of 50 nM and is selective for the adult epsilon-subunit receptor. Nothing of this kind — no binding assay, no electrophysiology, no subunit selectivity — has ever been published for Vialox.

PreclinicalPMID: 10087048

Structure-function studies of waglerin I, a lethal peptide from the venom of Wagler's pit viper, Trimeresurus wagleri.

The paper that makes the waglerin-fragment story impossible. A proteolytic fragment containing residues 6 to 22 of waglerin I was non-toxic, so bioactivity requires one or more of the first five residues — GGKPD, not GPRPA. Replacing the two half-cystines with alanine also abolished toxicity, meaning the single intramolecular disulfide bond is critical; GPRPA contains no cysteine at all.

PreclinicalPMID: 8533138

Initial interaction between fibrin and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). The Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro binding site on fibrin(ogen) is important for t-PA binding.

PreclinicalPMID: 8428923

Fibrinopeptide A binds Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro.

Establishes the real provenance of the GPRPA sequence, six years before the Behringwerke patent and two decades before any cosmetic use. Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro is the fibrin 'knob A' peptide: it inhibits fibrinogen aggregation by binding the same sites used to initiate fibrin formation.

PreclinicalPMID: 6589598

Cosmetic composition for skin application suitable for relaxing expression wrinkles (US Patent 7,846,483 B2; Labo Cosprophar AG; priority December 2004)

The earliest cosmetic patent on Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2, describing it as curare-like. At 0.3% in a nerve-muscle cell co-culture, contraction frequency fell about 70% at one minute and 61% at two hours; an uncontrolled 20-day questionnaire in 40 women using a multi-ingredient product found 75% reported fewer expression wrinkles.

Patent

Peptide inhibitors of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (US Patent 9,550,808 B2; Syneuro LLC; priority January 2013)

Patent

Peptidamides as fibrin clotting inhibitors (DE 40 14 655 A1; Behringwerke AG; priority May 1990)

Patent

Schagen SK. Topical Peptide Treatments with Effective Anti-Aging Results. Cosmetics 2017;4(2):16

The hinge of the whole Vialox literature, and not indexed in PubMed. This peer-reviewed review is where both the 49%/47% wrinkle figures and the 'derived from snake venom' claim entered the academic record, citing the 2013 Syneuro patent as its source. Later reviews and supplier pages cite Schagen in turn, which is how a patent background sentence became a widely repeated fact.

Review

PubChem CID 11605666 — Pentapeptide-3 (Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2), CAS 135679-88-8

Chemical Database

Quick Facts

Class
Cosmeceutical Peptide
Tier
D
Evidence
Preliminary
Safety
Limited Data
Updated
Nov 2026
Citations
21PubMed

Also known as

Pentapeptide-3GPRPAH-Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Ala-NH2Glycyl-L-prolyl-L-arginyl-L-prolyl-L-alaninamide

Tags

CosmeceuticalAnti-WrinkleCurare-Like PeptideMuscle RelaxantTopical PeptidenAChR Antagonist

Conditions Discussed

Evidence Score

Overall Confidence25%

Clinical Trials

View Clinical Trials

Links to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.