TB-500 is a lab-made version of a natural body protein (thymosin beta-4) that helps cells repair and move around. People use it to try to bounce back from injuries and heal wounds faster. Most of the promising data comes from animal studies, there are almost no human trials, and it's banned in sports.
What is TB-500?
TB-500 is a synthetic version of the active region of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring 43-amino acid peptide present in virtually all human cells. It promotes tissue repair by upregulating actin, a cell-building protein, and by promoting cell migration, blood vessel formation, and reducing inflammation. It is one of the most popular peptides for injury recovery.
What TB-500 Is Investigated For
TB-500 is investigated primarily for tissue repair through a mechanism distinct from BPC-157 — it regulates actin dynamics and cell migration rather than angiogenesis. The strongest preclinical signals are in wound healing, tendon/ligament repair, and cardiac tissue regeneration, where animal models consistently show accelerated recovery and reduced fibrosis. Hair regrowth and neuroprotection are interesting secondary signals emerging from broader thymosin beta-4 research. As with BPC-157, human clinical trials for the specific active fragment are essentially absent — most of the human data is for full-length recombinant thymosin beta-4, a related but larger molecule. The peptide is banned by WADA, a signal of perceived performance effects rather than proven efficacy.
History & Discovery
Thymosin beta-4, the parent 43-amino-acid peptide from which TB-500 is derived, was isolated from calf thymus by Teresa L. K. Low and Allan L. Goldstein as part of federally funded work on thymosin peptide fractions. Its complete 43-residue sequence was reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 1981, and the full chemical characterization — molecular weight 4982, isoelectric point 5.1, N-terminal acetylserine — followed in the Journal of Biological Chemistry in January 1982. Over the following decade Hynda Kleinman's group at the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research established much of the core biology — identifying thymosin beta-4 as a G-actin sequestering protein present in virtually every nucleated cell and showing that it accelerated wound healing in rodent models. This foundational work is the reason TB-4 is sometimes described as the prototypical 'regenerative' peptide. TB-500 itself is a synthetic peptide sold and researched as representing the active region of thymosin beta-4, though it is important to note that products sold under the TB-500 name are not always chemically identical to full-length recombinant TB-4 used in clinical trials. RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals pursued thymosin beta-4 through multiple clinical programs beginning in the 2000s, including dry eye (RGN-259), pressure ulcers and venous stasis ulcers (RGN-137), and cardiac ischemia — producing most of the human clinical data on the parent molecule. RGN-259 advanced into Phase 3 for dry eye disease through a US/Canada license to ReGenTree LLC (a joint venture with Korean GtreeBNT, subsequently acquired by HLB Therapeutics), running the ARISE-1, ARISE-2, and ARISE-3 trials. ARISE-3 missed its co-primary endpoints in 2022, hitting only a secondary ocular-grittiness signal; the program pivoted to neurotrophic keratopathy through parallel Phase 3s (SEER-2 in the US, SEER-3 in Europe). In 2024 SEER-3 also failed to meet its primary endpoint of complete corneal healing at 4 weeks, which HLB attributed to an outsized placebo response. No NDA or BLA has been filed for RGN-259 in either indication as of 2026, and the formal-pharma arm of thymosin beta-4 development is essentially stalled. The peptide nonetheless entered the sports and research-chemical market in the 2010s, where it is commonly stacked with BPC-157 for musculoskeletal repair despite the lack of human trials evaluating that specific combination.
How It Works
TB-500 helps your body repair itself faster by promoting the migration of repair cells to injury sites, growing new blood vessels to supply healing tissue, and reducing scar formation. It works on tendons, ligaments, muscles, skin, and even the heart.
TB-500 contains the actin-binding domain of thymosin beta-4, sequestering G-actin monomers and promoting F-actin polymerization for cell migration. It upregulates Akt/mTOR signaling for cell survival and proliferation. It promotes angiogenesis through VEGF upregulation, reduces inflammation via NF-kB modulation, and decreases fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-beta-driven collagen deposition. Ac-SDKP — a separate thymosin beta-4 cleavage product released by prolyl oligopeptidase, distinct from TB-500 and covered on its own page — specifically inhibits hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and has anti-fibrotic properties.
Evidence Snapshot
Human Clinical Evidence
Limited. Some clinical observations and small studies. Thymosin beta-4 has been in clinical trials for wound healing and dry eye.
Animal / Preclinical
Strong. Extensive data on wound healing, cardiac repair, and tissue regeneration in animal models.
Mechanistic Rationale
Strong. Actin biology and tissue repair mechanisms are well-characterized.
Research Gaps & Open Questions
What the current literature has not yet settled about TB-500:
- 01Human efficacy for the TB-500 fragment specifically — most human clinical data exists for full-length recombinant TB-4 (RegeneRx programs), not for the synthetic TB-500 fragment sold in the research-chemical market, and identity/purity of marketed TB-500 products is often not verified.
- 02Long-term safety and cancer risk — TB-4's documented role in tumor cell migration and metastasis in multiple cancer models has not been resolved through long-duration human safety data, leaving a meaningful oncology-signal question unanswered.
- 03Optimal human dosing — no human dose-ranging study has established minimum effective or maximum tolerated doses for musculoskeletal injury indications.
- 04Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous and intramuscular administration in humans — bioavailability, tissue distribution, and effective half-life have not been rigorously characterized.
- 05TB-500 plus BPC-157 combination data — despite widespread anecdotal use of this stack, no controlled human study has evaluated additive or synergistic effects, adverse-event rates, or whether either peptide alone would achieve the same outcome.
- 06Differentiation between full-length TB-4 and synthetic fragment products — whether pharmacologic effects observed for recombinant TB-4 generalize to the shorter synthetic fragments commonly sold as TB-500 has not been established.
Forms & Administration
SC or IM injection. Loading phase: 2-2.5mg twice weekly for 4-6 weeks. Maintenance: 2mg every 2 weeks. Often combined with BPC-157 for synergistic healing. All injectable peptides should only be administered under the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider. Never self-administer without clinician oversight.
Dosing & Protocols
The ranges below reflect protocols commonly discussed in the literature and by clinicians — not a prescription. Actual dosing for any individual should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider who knows the patient.
Typical Range
Protocols discussed for injection typically use 2–2.5 mg per dose, with a front-loading phase of 2.5 mg twice weekly for 4–6 weeks followed by maintenance of 2 mg every 1–2 weeks. Some protocols use 5 mg once weekly during loading. These numbers come from community and clinician-reported protocols rather than human dose-ranging trials; the animal literature uses widely varying doses on a mg/kg basis that do not translate cleanly to human flat doses.
Frequency
During a loading phase, twice-weekly injection is the most commonly described cadence. After 4–6 weeks many protocols shift to once weekly or once every two weeks for maintenance. The rationale for infrequent dosing versus daily dosing is pharmacokinetic: thymosin beta-4's circulating half-life is short, but its effects on cell migration and actin remodeling are thought to persist beyond plasma clearance.
Timing Considerations
Time of day
No strict time of day — TB-500's long plasma persistence and typical twice-weekly or weekly dosing mean daily clock time is not meaningful.
Relative to meals
No meal timing required; inject at a consistent time rather than a specific meal window.
Relative to exercise
Not tied to training sessions. Some users align injections with rest days on the rationale that repair signaling proceeds during recovery periods, though this is convention rather than pharmacokinetic necessity.
Cycle Length
A typical discussed cycle is a 4–6 week loading phase followed by a lower-frequency maintenance phase or a washout. Some clinicians use 4–8 week courses tied to the healing timeline of a specific injury, then stop. Continuous long-term use has not been studied in humans.
Protocol Notes
TB-500 is typically supplied as a lyophilized powder requiring reconstitution in bacteriostatic water. A common reconstitution is 5 mg of peptide in 2–3 mL of bacteriostatic water; with 2 mL that yields 2,500 mcg/mL, meaning a 2 mg dose is 0.8 mL on an insulin syringe. Subcutaneous injection into the abdominal fat pad is the most common route; intramuscular injection near the affected tissue is also used in musculoskeletal protocols. One point of confusion worth flagging: the products sold as 'TB-500' on the research-chemical market may correspond to different synthetic fragments (commonly the N-acetylated 17-23 region of TB-4 identified in doping control literature) rather than the full 43-amino-acid thymosin beta-4 used in RegeneRx's clinical work. This means that dosing extrapolated from TB-4 clinical trials does not map cleanly to TB-500 products, and purity and identity should not be assumed. TB-500 is commonly stacked with BPC-157 in recovery protocols. There is no human trial evidence for the combination; the rationale is mechanistic complementarity (actin-driven cell migration plus angiogenesis and growth factor modulation) rather than demonstrated additive benefit.
These numbers are not a prescription. TB-500 is not FDA-approved for any medical condition, and products sold under this name vary in identity and purity. Any actual use should be under the direct supervision of a qualified healthcare provider.
Timeline of Effects
Onset
Anecdotal reports from injury-recovery use commonly describe initial subjective improvement (reduced pain or stiffness) within 1–2 weeks of starting a loading protocol. Tissue-level healing signals are inherently slower and are typically described over 3–4 weeks rather than days. Human trials of full-length TB-4 in dermal and corneal wound healing saw measurable endpoint changes on the order of several weeks.
Peak Effect
Peak effect is typically described in the 4–8 week window corresponding to the end of a standard loading phase. This aligns with the tissue-remodeling timelines observed in preclinical wound-healing models. Whether continued dosing beyond this window adds benefit or simply maintains a plateau is not established.
After Discontinuation
Thymosin beta-4's plasma half-life is short (minutes to a few hours), but its downstream effects on actin dynamics, cell migration, and tissue remodeling persist longer. Most users describe benefits that persist after cessation provided the underlying tissue has healed; ongoing anti-inflammatory effects tend to fade within weeks of discontinuation. Rebound effects have not been systematically described.
Monitoring & Measurement
Bloodwork & Labs
- •hs-CRP — systemic inflammation proxy; useful when the injury context is inflammatory
- •ESR — slower-moving inflammation marker, pairs with hs-CRP
- •CBC — tracks hematocrit, since TB-500 has documented angiogenic activity, and rules out confounding issues
- •Comprehensive metabolic panel — baseline only, for hepatic anchor
Functional & Performance Tests
- •Standardized pain score (VAS or NRS) on the target tissue, recorded daily
- •Goniometer-measured range of motion for the affected joint
- •Sport- or task-specific functional test (single-leg hop, grip strength, walking distance, throwing velocity — pick one your injury is actually limited by)
- •Diagnostic ultrasound or MRI at baseline and end-of-cycle for structural injuries
When to Test
Symptom and functional tracking daily. hs-CRP and CBC at baseline and 4–6 weeks. Imaging at baseline and end of a 4–6 week cycle if accessible.
Interpretation & Notes
As with BPC-157, TB-500's claimed effect is tissue-local and slow — the measurement job is functional documentation rather than a blood-marker chase. The credible at-home setup is a disciplined pain-and-function log paired with pre- and post-cycle imaging. hs-CRP moves when the injury context is systemically inflammatory and can stay flat in mechanical injuries where the peptide may still be helping. TB-500's theoretical angiogenesis signal is the reason the oncology-risk discussion exists — if you have a cancer history or active screening concern, this warrants a clinician conversation before use, not a post-hoc lab. There is no validated serum marker that tracks TB-500 activity. Basic panels via LabCorp, Quest, Marek Health, or Ulta Lab Tests; imaging typically needs a clinician order.
Common Questions
What's the difference between TB-500 and thymosin beta-4?
TB-500 is a synthetic peptide representing the active region of full-length thymosin beta-4. They share the same mechanism of action. TB-500 is more commonly available than full-length TB4.
How does TB-500 differ from BPC-157?
While both are discussed for recovery, TB-500 works primarily through actin regulation and cell migration, while BPC-157 works through angiogenesis and growth factor modulation. Some people discuss using them together.
Did TB-500 get pulled from compounding pharmacies, and did the 2026 FDA vote bring it back?
Access tightened after the FDA's review of peptides considered for 503A compounding placed the TB-500 fragment (listed by FDA as thymosin beta-4 fragment LKKTETQ) in Category 2 — the bucket for bulk substances that may present significant safety risks — and in practice licensed US compounding pharmacies stopped preparing TB-500 for human use. Two things changed in 2026, neither as decisively as commonly reported. Effective 22 April 2026, TB-500 was one of 17 bulk substances that came off FDA's Category 2 list after their nominators withdrew the nominations (BPC-157, KPV, injectable GHK-Cu, and LL-37 among them), which is not the same as authorizing compounding: TB-500 is not on any 503A bulks list. Then on 23–24 July 2026 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted 8–6, with one abstention, to recommend TB-500 for the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances list — over the objection of FDA's own reviewers, who found the supporting studies short and underpowered. That recommendation is advisory and non-binding, and actual addition to the list requires notice-and-comment rulemaking that has not happened. So the honest answer is that TB-500 sits in a more favourable regulatory position than a year ago but still has no clear compounding authorization, and remaining supply moves through research-chemical channels not authorized for human administration.
Should TB-500 be injected near the injury site or anywhere subcutaneously?
Both approaches are described in community protocols and there is no human dose-localization study to settle the question. The site-of-injury rationale assumes higher local tissue concentration, which is mechanistically plausible for a peptide that acts on local cell migration and remodeling. The general subcutaneous rationale notes that TB-4 distributes systemically once absorbed and that any nucleated cell can respond. Practically, abdominal subcutaneous injection is the most common default; intramuscular injection near a musculoskeletal injury is a reasonable alternative when the affected tissue is accessible. Neither has been shown superior in a controlled human trial.
Is TB-500 still WADA-banned now that compounded access has closed in the US?
Yes. WADA names TB-500 under S2.3 (growth factors and growth factor modulators: 'thymosin-β4 and its derivatives e.g. TB-500') on both the 2026 and 2027 lists. That prohibition is independent of any single country's regulatory status, and the ban applies at all times — in and out of competition. Doping-control laboratories run validated assays that specifically target the TB-500 synthetic fragment, and athletes have been sanctioned even when they sourced the peptide through legal-in-context-of-research channels. The FDA's compounding decision does not change the doping code in either direction.
Who TB-500 Is NOT For
- •Pregnancy — no human pregnancy safety data exists; TB-4's broad effects on cell migration and angiogenesis raise theoretical fetal-development concerns that have not been studied.
- •Breastfeeding — no data on transfer into breast milk or effects on nursing infants.
- •Active or recent-history cancer — thymosin beta-4 has been implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis in several cancer types (including thyroid, hepatocellular, and colorectal), and several preclinical studies have shown that blocking TB-4 attenuates tumor progression. This is the most serious mechanistic concern for TB-500 and is reason for caution in anyone with an active or recent malignancy.
- •Pediatric use (under 18) — no studies in pediatric populations; developmental signaling effects are unknown.
- •Known hypersensitivity to peptide therapeutics or to excipients used in compounded preparations.
- •Concurrent anti-angiogenic oncology therapy — TB-500's promotion of angiogenesis and cell migration would be expected to oppose the intended effect of agents like bevacizumab or VEGF-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Drug & Supplement Interactions
Documented human drug interactions for TB-500 are absent because human pharmacology studies are absent; what follows is theoretical and derived from mechanism. The most important theoretical interaction is with anti-angiogenic oncology and ophthalmology therapies (bevacizumab, aflibercept, VEGF-targeted kinase inhibitors): TB-500's upregulation of VEGF and cell migration opposes the intended effect of these agents, and co-administration should be avoided. Similar caution applies to patients receiving anti-VEGF intravitreal injections for wet macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy. Because TB-4 modulates inflammatory signaling including NF-kB, theoretical interactions may exist with immunosuppressants used after transplant or for autoimmune disease, though direction and magnitude in humans are unknown. Patients on anticoagulants should be aware that the peptide's effects on vasculature and platelet behavior are not well characterized in humans. Absence of documented interactions is not the same as absence of interactions, and any concurrent medication use should be disclosed to the prescribing clinician.
Safety Profile
Common Side Effects
Cautions
- • Not FDA-approved
- • Theoretical concern about promoting growth of existing tumors
- • Banned by WADA in competitive sports
What We Don't Know
Long-term safety in humans is not well-established. Cancer risk with chronic use needs more study.
Legal Status
United States
TB-500 and thymosin beta-4 are not FDA-approved for any indication. Full-length recombinant TB-4 (RGN-259, RGN-137) has been studied in clinical trials under RegeneRx and its partners — up to Phase 3 for the RGN-259 eye drops (ARISE in dry eye, SEER in neurotrophic keratopathy) — but has not advanced to approval. TB-500 has historically been available through compounding pharmacies and research-chemical suppliers; following the FDA's 2023 review of peptides considered for 503A compounding, access tightened, though enforcement varies. Research-chemical channel sales are not intended or authorized for human use. Two 2026 developments moved the compounding picture, in the same direction but not as far as often reported. Effective 22 April 2026 TB-500 came off FDA's Category 2 list as one of 17 bulk substances whose nominators withdrew their nominations, and at the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meeting of 23–24 July 2026 the committee voted 8–6, with one abstention, to recommend TB-500 for inclusion on the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances list. It was one of six peptides recommended out of seven nominated — with BPC-157, KPV, MOTS-c, semax, and epitalon — and only emideltide (DSIP) was voted against. FDA's own reviewers had argued against addition, citing short and underpowered studies. Neither step authorizes compounding. Removal from Category 2 was not authorization, PCAC recommendations are non-binding, and formal addition to the bulks list requires notice-and-comment rulemaking that has not been completed. The practical position remains that licensed US compounding pharmacies have no clear authorization to prepare TB-500 for human use, notwithstanding a favourable advisory vote. On 28 October 2026 that ambiguity was partly resolved, though not in the way most coverage implied. HHS filed an enforcement discretion policy — Docket HHS-OASH-2026-0496, RIN 0910-ZD94, published in the Federal Register on 30 October as FR Doc. 2026-22192 and signed by Secretary Kennedy — stating that it does not intend to take enforcement action against a state-licensed pharmacy, federal facility or licensed physician that compounds a drug product using one of six named peptide bulk drug substances: BPC-157, TB-500, epitalon, KPV, MOTS-c and semax. For TB-500 the covered identity is the acetate salt, limited to subcutaneous and intramuscular injection. The discretion is narrow and conditional. The active ingredient must come from an FDA-registered manufacturer operating under CGMP, with the manufacturing facility identified on the certificate of analysis — a repacker's or distributor's registration does not satisfy this — and must be supported by analytical testing covering identity including sequence, purity, potency, impurities, residual solvents, elemental impurities, microbial content and endotoxins. Each compounded product may contain only one covered active ingredient. That single-ingredient rule has a consequence worth spelling out, because it cuts against the most common way these peptides are actually used: a compounded product combining two listed peptides — BPC-157 with TB-500, for instance — falls outside the policy even though each is individually covered. Section 503A's patient-specific prescription requirement still applies, so this is not a licence for commercial-scale production, and the policy does not extend to 503B outsourcing facilities. Compounders must report product details to FDA and state authorities, report adverse events and quality problems through MedWatch, and label products with reporting instructions and the statement that this is a compounded drug product not for resale. What it is not is an approval. The notice states that FDA's future rulemakings may propose adding some or all of these peptides to the 503A bulks list, that the policy does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on HHS or the public, and that HHS may revisit it if a safety signal or product quality issue arises. TB-500 is still not on the 503A bulks list, nothing has been shown to be safe or effective, and FDA's own reviewers had recommended against all seven nominated peptides. The comment period runs roughly two weeks from publication, and the rulemaking that would make any of this durable is generally estimated at 12 to 24 months.
International
No major regulator (EMA, MHRA, TGA, Health Canada) has authorized TB-500 or thymosin beta-4 as a medicine. Australia's TGA treats it as a Schedule 4 prescription-only substance and has taken enforcement action. Most other jurisdictions treat it as an unapproved investigational agent, and importation of personal-use quantities is restricted in several countries.
Sports & Competition
TB-500 is explicitly prohibited by WADA under S2.3 (growth factors and growth factor modulators), which names 'thymosin-β4 and its derivatives e.g. TB-500' on both the 2026 list and the 2027 list in force from January 1, 2027. Prohibited at all times, in and out of competition. Multiple athletes — including high-profile cases in horse racing and human sport — have been sanctioned for TB-500 use. Doping-control laboratories have developed and validated assays specifically targeting the TB-500 synthetic fragment. Athletes subject to WADA code, USADA, UKAD, or equivalent bodies should treat TB-500 as unambiguously banned.
Regulatory status changes over time. Verify current local rules with a qualified professional.
Myths & Misconceptions
Myth
TB-500 is the same thing as thymosin beta-4.
Reality
TB-500 is typically a synthetic fragment marketed as representing the active region of thymosin beta-4, not full-length TB-4. The human clinical trial data (RegeneRx's clinical programs in dry eye and neurotrophic keratopathy (up to Phase 3), wound healing, and cardiac ischemia) was largely performed with full-length recombinant TB-4, and products sold as TB-500 cannot be assumed to share identical pharmacology, purity, or efficacy.
Myth
TB-500 is FDA-approved for injury recovery.
Reality
It is not approved for any indication. No version of thymosin beta-4 — full-length or fragment — has received regulatory approval as a drug. Its availability has historically been through compounding pharmacies and research-chemical suppliers, not as an approved medicine.
Myth
TB-500 is safe from a sports-doping standpoint because it's 'just a healing peptide.'
Reality
TB-500 is explicitly named by WADA under S2.3 and prohibited at all times, and validated doping-control assays for the TB-500 fragment exist. Athletes have been sanctioned for its use. Treating it as outside the doping code because of its healing rationale is factually wrong and career-risking.
Myth
TB-500 and BPC-157 work better together than alone, based on the evidence.
Reality
There is no controlled human trial evaluating the TB-500 plus BPC-157 combination. The rationale for stacking them is mechanistic complementarity (actin/migration plus angiogenesis/growth factors), but 'makes sense mechanistically' is not the same as 'demonstrated additive benefit in humans.' The only animal study to test the pair head-to-head, a 2026 rat Achilles tendon transection study (Biçer et al.), found the combination conferred no additional benefit over either peptide alone. The stack is ubiquitous in community protocols, but the evidentiary basis is thin.
Myth
Because TB-4 is present in nearly every human cell, exogenous TB-500 must be safe.
Reality
Endogenous presence of a signaling molecule does not imply that supraphysiologic exogenous dosing is safe. TB-4 has documented roles in tumor cell migration and metastasis across several cancer types in preclinical work, and long-term human safety data is absent. The 'naturally occurring' framing is misleading when applied to injectable dosing at research-chemical concentrations.
Published Research
41 studiesEffects of BPC-157 and TB-500 on Achilles tendon healing in rats: A histopathological and biomechanical study (Biçer et al., Jt Dis Relat Surg 2026)
The only head-to-head animal test of the BPC-157 plus TB-500 stack: 32 rats with transected and repaired Achilles tendons, dosed intraperitoneally for four weeks. TB-500 alone gave the strongest result — significantly higher maximum load to failure and significantly better Bonar and Movin histology scores — while the combination conferred no additional benefit over either peptide alone. It is the single study behind this page's scepticism about the stack.
Thymosin beta4-derived peptides alleviate neuroinflammation and neurite atrophy in both in vitro models and in vivo 5xFAD mice: A potential therapy for memory improvement in Alzheimer's disease.
Recombinant human thymosin beta 4 improves ischemic cardiac dysfunction in mice and patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion
The only randomized controlled trial of thymosin beta-4 in myocardial infarction, and the headline needs its caveat: among 96 STEMI patients after primary PCI, infarct area at 90 days was significantly reduced only in the 43 who received their first dose within 8 hours, while across the full cohort the difference was not significant. The paired mouse ischemia-reperfusion work traced the effect to ErbB2/Raf1 signaling, since ErbB2 inhibition abolished it.
Thymosin beta 4 as an Alzheimer disease intervention target identified using human brain organoids
Thymosin Beta-4 Modulates Cardiac Remodeling by Regulating ROCK1 Expression in Adult Mammals
Enhancing fat graft survival: thymosin beta-4 facilitates mitochondrial transfer from ADSCs via tunneling nanotubes by upregulating the Rac/F-actin pathway
Thymosin β(4) and β(10) Expression in Human Organs during Development: A Review
Thymosin beta-4 - A potential tool in healing middle ear lesions in adult mammals
Thymosin Beta 4 Protects Hippocampal Neuronal Cells against PrP (106-126) via Neurotrophic Factor Signaling
Thymosin beta 4: A potential novel adjunct treatment for bacterial keratitis
Thymosin beta 4 prevents systemic lipopolysaccharide-induced plaque load in middle-age APP/PS1 mice
Thymosin Beta 4 Inhibits LPS and ATP-Induced Hepatic Stellate Cells via the Regulation of Multiple Signaling Pathways
Thymosin beta-4 denotes new directions towards developing prosperous anti-aging regenerative therapies
Aberrant Expression of Thymosin Beta-4 Correlates With Advanced Disease and BRAF V600E Mutation in Thyroid Cancer
Thymosin beta-4 improves endothelial function and reparative potency of diabetic endothelial cells differentiated from patient induced pluripotent stem cells
Adjunctive Thymosin Beta-4 Treatment Influences PMN Effector Cell Function during Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Induced Corneal Infection
A first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, single- and multiple-dose, phase I study of recombinant human thymosin β4 in healthy Chinese volunteers
The only first-in-human study of the parent molecule: 54 healthy volunteers given single intravenous doses of recombinant human Tβ4 (NL005) across seven cohorts from 0.05 to 25.0 μg/kg, plus 30 subjects dosed daily for 10 days. Adverse events were mild to moderate, with no dose-limiting toxicity, no serious adverse events and no accumulation on repeat dosing — the safety floor the human literature rests on, and it concerns intravenous full-length Tβ4, not the injected TB-500 fragment.
Utilizing Developmentally Essential Secreted Peptides Such as Thymosin Beta-4 to Remind the Adult Organs of Their Embryonic State-New Directions in Anti-Aging Regenerative Therapies
Thymosin beta 4 and the eye: the journey from bench to bedside
Thymosin beta 4 regulation of actin in sepsis
Sources of variability in quantifying circulating thymosin beta-4: literature review and recommendations
Potential role of thymosin beta 4 in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Adsorption effects of the doping relevant peptides Insulin Lispro, Synachten, TB-500 and GHRP 5
Thymosin Beta 4: A Potential Novel Therapy for Neurotrophic Keratopathy, Dry Eye, and Ocular Surface Diseases
Thymosin β4 Promotes Dermal Healing
Cardioprotection by Thymosin Beta 4
Thymosin Beta 4 Is a Potential Regulator of Hepatic Stellate Cells
Potential role of thymosin Beta 4 in liver fibrosis
Doping control analysis of TB-500, a synthetic version of an active region of thymosin β₄, in equine urine and plasma by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
The first confirmation of TB-500 and its metabolites in post-administration samples, from the Hong Kong Jockey Club racing laboratory: N-acetylated LKKTETQ was detected down to 0.02 ng/mL in equine plasma and 0.01 ng/mL in urine after a single 10 mg dose. Validated doping-control assays for the TB-500 fragment have therefore existed since 2012, which is why treating it as undetectable is not a defensible assumption for a tested athlete.
Synthesis and characterization of the N-terminal acetylated 17-23 fragment of thymosin beta 4 identified in TB-500, a product suspected to possess doping potential
The paper that identified what is actually in a vial of TB-500: Ghent University's doping control laboratory resolved the content as the N-terminally acetylated 17-23 fragment of human thymosin beta-4 (Ac-LKKTETQ) by high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometry, then synthesized the fragment and proposed a plasma and urine assay. It is the single source for this page's point that TB-500 is a seven-residue fragment, not the 43-amino-acid protein used in clinical trials.
Thymosin β4: a multi-functional regenerative peptide. Basic properties and clinical applications
Thymosin beta-4 is essential for coronary vessel development and promotes neovascularization via adult epicardium
Riley's group at UCL establishing that thymosin beta-4 is required for coronary vessel development and that, in adult heart explants, it releases quiescent epicardium-derived cells to migrate outward and differentiate into endothelial cells, smooth muscle and fibroblasts. This is the mechanistic basis for the entire cardiac-repair line of Tβ4 research, published as the peptide entered multicentre Phase 1 cardiovascular trials.
Thymosin beta-4 and the eye: I can see clearly now the pain is gone
Adhesive and proteolytic phenotype of migrating endothelial cells induced by thymosin beta-4
Thymosin beta4 promotes angiogenesis, wound healing, and hair follicle development.
Philp, Goldstein and Kleinman's report that Tβ4 promotes angiogenesis, wound repair and hair growth in both normal and aged rodents, acting by increasing angiogenesis and cell migration rather than through any follicle-specific pathway. It is the origin of the hair-regrowth claim attached to TB-500, and the evidence behind it remains rodent — no controlled human hair trial has been run.
Thymosin beta 4 interactions
Thymosin beta4 accelerates wound healing
The foundational wound-healing experiment, from Kleinman's lab at the NIDCR: in a rat full-thickness wound model, topical or intraperitoneal Tβ4 increased reepithelialization by 42% at day 4 and 61% at day 7 over saline, with greater collagen deposition and angiogenesis, and stimulated keratinocyte migration 2–3-fold with as little as 10 pg of peptide. Nearly every later tissue-repair claim made for TB-500 traces back to this result.
Chemical characterization of thymosin beta 4
Low and Goldstein's full chemical characterization in the Journal of Biological Chemistry — 43 residues, Mr 4982, isoelectric point 5.1, N-terminal acetylserine, the complete sequence solved by automated and manual Edman degradation. This is the paper that defines what thymosin beta-4 is, and every product sold as TB-500 is described by reference to a fragment of the sequence established here.
Thymosin beta 4: a ubiquitous peptide in rat and mouse tissues
The paper that broke 'thymosin' out of the thymus: Hannappel and Horecker's group found Tβ4 across rat and mouse spleen, brain, lung, liver and heart muscle, at especially high concentration in peritoneal macrophages, and still abundant in athymic nude mice. It is the origin of the now-routine claim that the peptide is present in virtually every tissue rather than being a thymic hormone.
RGN-259 (Tβ4 ophthalmic) for neurotrophic keratopathy: SEER-1 Phase III results
The most advanced human efficacy trial of thymosin beta-4 in any indication, and far smaller than the Phase III label suggests: 18 neurotrophic keratopathy patients, with complete corneal healing at 4 weeks in 6 of 10 on 0.1% RGN-259 versus 1 of 8 on placebo — p = 0.0656, a trend that missed the primary endpoint. Secondary measures of ocular discomfort, foreign body sensation and Mackie stage did separate, and no significant adverse effects were seen.
HLB Therapeutics misses primary endpoint in Phase 3 SEER-3 trial of RGN-259 (Ophthalmology Times, 2024)
Popular Stacks Including TB-500
Wolverine Peptide Stack (BPC-157 + TB-500)
The Wolverine Stack is the most popular peptide recovery combination — BPC-157 for localized tissue repair paired with TB-500 for systemic healing, cell migration, and anti-inflammatory support.
GLOW Peptide Stack (BPC-157 + TB-500 + GHK-Cu)
GLOW is a popular pre-mixed compounded peptide blend combining BPC-157 tissue repair, TB-500 cell migration, and GHK-Cu collagen remodeling in a single 70 mg vial. Also covers the two-peptide BPC-157 + GHK-Cu pairing for practitioners sourcing vials separately.
KLOW Peptide Stack (BPC-157 + TB-500 + GHK-Cu + KPV)
KLOW is a pre-mixed four-peptide compounded blend combining BPC-157 and TB-500 systemic repair, GHK-Cu collagen remodeling, and KPV anti-inflammatory coverage in a single 80 mg vial. It extends the popular GLOW formulation with an explicit anti-inflammatory layer.
BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV (Copper-Free KLOW)
The Wolverine repair backbone plus KPV for anti-inflammatory coverage, with GHK-Cu deliberately left out. This is what people run when they want KLOW's inflammation layer without the copper — because of a copper-metabolism concern, because the collagen layer is not their goal, or because they would rather dose three peptides independently than buy a fixed-ratio pre-mixed vial.
Quick Facts
- Class
- Tissue Repair Peptide
- Tier
- C
- Evidence
- Emerging
- Safety
- Moderate Data
- Updated
- Nov 2026
- Citations
- 41PubMed
Also known as
Tags
Peptide Families
Related Goals
Evidence Score
Clinical Trials
View Clinical TrialsLinks to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.